I really don’t understand why you defending this report like it is a religions text when they have written in bold font

“Republicans’ Investigation Did Not Uncover the Origins of COVID-19—Both Pathways Remain Plausible, and We Are More or Less Where We Started”

They report even conclude with details of what it is about. 1) baseless attack by republican against Fauci 2) misconduct regarding New York nursing homes 3) CDC’s school reopening guidance

All of which have nothing to do with “Proof that covid was not a leak because the strain are different”

Like even reading further they literary say the same thing as I am saying:

the origins of COVID-19 are unknown. A zoonotic origin and lab accident are both plausible, as is a “hybrid” scenario reflecting a mixture of the two. It was repeatedly explained to the Select Subcommittee that all prior epidemics and pandemics, as well as almost all prior outbreaks, have zoonotic origins. At the same time, a lab origin for COVID-19 also remains plausible. Although arguments for a lab origin are largely circumstantial, they cannot and should not be dismissed out of hand. However, one thing that nearly all witnesses who testified on this issue agreed upon was that without greater transparency from the Chinese Communist Party, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to know the origins of COVID-19.