Hamilton said Congress should focus on clawing back Trump’s tariffs and ending the war with Iran.

Sen.-elect Adam Hamilton, who flipped deep-red Kansas for Democrats, said Sunday that he hopes to prioritize lowering costs for his constituents in the next Congress and that he would be “deeply disappointed” to spend two years investigating members of the Trump administration.

“The bigger priority for me, and I think for most people in America, especially people living paycheck to paycheck, is ‘please help us with the cost of living,’” Hamilton told NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

Specifically, he said the new Congress should immediately focus on ending the war in Iran and “claw[ing] back tariffs policies.”

“If I spent the next two years — my first two years in the Senate — in investigations, I’d be deeply disappointed. I want to get to work helping the people in my state and helping the people across the country,” Hamilton said.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lol, no it’s not.

      You interpreted my comment as focusing exclusively on the single next presidential election, while I always meant the bigger picture.

      The right wing and swing voters in America by and large did not care about impeachment. They voted in maga republicans after maga republican, and not only returned him to power, but also elected a majority Republican Senate and House that loudly and enthusiastically endorsed him.

      • cruseo@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just saying “nuh-uh!” And then doubling down doesn’t make for a good counter argument.

          • cruseo@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Oh, I see, it’s my fault you can’t make a logical argument.

            So you triple down with an ad hominem… At least you’re consistent

              • cruseo@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Apparently, it’s you that has problem with reading comprehension, since you missed the several comments where I pointed out the flaws in your argument. And the best you can do is schoolyard insults?

                Not very convincing.

                  • cruseo@piefed.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    Go on, keep deflecting by trying to discuss anything other than your flawed argument.

                    Very convincing

                    Why do gifs make you so mad?