The conversations are amazing

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No. Like I said, I think your explanation could also make sense. It’s just not the assumption that I made.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Fair enough. However, I think it’s worth pointing out that the most vocal users of such iconography, when confronted with even the possibility that it may in fact be racist to depict a chinese man as a yellow bear (curiously, usually depicted wearing a red shirt, like the flag of the PRC), they tie themselves into frothing logical pretzels to defend their usage, rather than shifting to any other clearly non-racist yet still insulting caricature.

      Note: absolutely not saying the author of Pooh was making anti-China iconography way back when, I am pointing out modern usage.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        His shirt being red referencing the PRC is actually a great non-racist visual connection. And of course they wouldn’t suddenly switch to another caricature; the meme is Pooh, so that’s what they’re going to use.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The thing with the shirt is that it places greater emphasis on the visuals. If we accept that there’s in some cases a connection to the shirt, we can also accept that that means there is certainly connection to the yellow bear. “Yellowface” is already a known concept.