∃∀λ@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1245arrow-down16
arrow-up1239arrow-down1external-linkHouses are for living, not for speculationen.wikipedia.org∃∀λ@programming.dev to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square39linkfedilink
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·8 months agoDo you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·8 months agoNo, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting. Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.
Do you truly, actually, believe that the reign of Mao was a net positive?
No, just that his stance on landlords may be worth revisiting.
Adam Smith was also anti-landlord, FWIW.