• masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    And now it isn’t, that’s democracy,

    Abso-fucking-lutely not. Fascists would NEVER be able to gain power in a truly democratic society. No ifs, ands or butts.

    Fascists are funded into power (and into existence) by CAPITALISTS - adherents to an ideology that is violently incompatible with anything that can be called democratic with a straight face.

    Brazil is not a democratic society. It is a (so-called) “liberal democracy” - something that can be more accurately described as 95% capitalism with some fake democracy substitute thrown in as a legitimising measure.

    That is THE WHOLE POINT of liberalism.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Save it for the next fascist your (supposedly) “democratic” system siccs on you, liberal.

        • Scallops@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          You’re pinning for a system that prevents fascism, but it doesn’t exist. You prevent it through other sociological structures. The method for selecting power can’t do what you want it to do.

          But by all means, keep trying to bait people online, I’m sure that helps you somehow.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            a system that prevents fascism, but it doesn’t exist.

            Who brainwashed you into thinking that? The liberals who always come up with a 1001 excuses to keep fascism around, perhaps?

            You prevent it through other sociological structures.

            And what “sociological structures” would these be, pray tell?

            The method for selecting power can’t do what you want it to do.

            Oh we cannot democratically decide what power should do or how it should be distributed, eh?

            Why am I not surprised that your TRUE ideology turns out to be as anti-democratic as the status quo you are shilling for?