• fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nonsense.

      Anyone that cared about the plight of Palestinians voted democrat, because the dems would have delivered a dramatically better outcome than what is going to happen now.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They’ve had over a year to deliver a dramatically better outcome. I voted democrat straight down the ticket like I always do, but I’m not going to delude myself into thinking they were actually going to produce a better outcome because biden refused to apply any pressure on israel and instead only sent billions of dollars of weapons in support. Harris was looking to continue the same policy. It should be a very easy win to denounce genocide, but they couldn’t even do that during an election when they needed the votes. Why would they change policy after winning when they didn’t need the votes?

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Again, this take is just nonsensical. It’s illogical.

          Natanyahu is going to grind Palestinians into the dust with Trump’s backing. Palestinians would be better off with Harris as POTUS.

          Yet you’re trying to assert that Harris lost because she didn’t win the votes of people who care about the plight of Palestinians? That’s an absurdity.