Summary

Secretary of State Marco Rubio grew visibly frustrated during an ABC News interview when questioned about the Trump administrationā€™s approach to Russia.

Defending Trumpā€™s push for peace talks with Putin, Rubio insisted negotiations were necessary but admitted the administration didnā€™t know Russiaā€™s demands.

He clashed with host George Stephanopoulos over Trumpā€™s refusal to call Putin a dictator and the U.S. siding with Russia in a recent UN vote.

Rubio also compared Trumpā€™s handling of Ukraine to Bidenā€™s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    7 hours ago

    Russian federal subjects would semi-autonomously be their own countries. Falling under supervision of the UN and neighbouring countries

    But that is on the US and China agreeing to it when currently both are against that

    It does give China potentially direct control over some resources they would want but they already can get those without weakening their position

    • nednobbins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      4 hours ago

      I can see why this would be a good outcome for Europe.

      It essentially turns Russia into a puppet state. If we were to eliminate China and the US, that would make Russia Europeā€™s puppet state. While it has some obvious advantages to Europe, itā€™s clearly not in the interest of either Putin or Russia (the most pessimistic estimates put his approval rating at over 60% among Russians).

      Since itā€™s obviously not to their advantage they wonā€™t agree to it. That means someone would have to force them to accept that new status quo. The US just dropped all support and China has made it pretty clear that theyā€™re not going to participate in any operation like that either.

      So that leaves the EU. Iā€™ll circle back to my earlier question. Do you think the EU is ready to adopt and ratify a constitution if it came up again? Absent that, do you think the EU can put together a military coalition thatā€™s big enough and permanent enough to induce an immediate surrender by Russia? If not, do you think that the EU is willing and able to wage a protracted direct war against Russia?

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        4 hours ago

        It canā€™t be supervised by itā€™s neighbours if the two biggest neighbours arenā€™t apart of it

        If the US and China abandon Ukraine WW3 will happen so to pretend thereā€™s a safe way out of it is unreasonable

        The US will look to Canada

        Russia will look to Germany

        China will look to Taiwan

        • nednobbins@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          3 hours ago

          I donā€™t know if any of your predictions are true. They might be, but I donā€™t have nearly enough evidence to be confident in any of them.

          If they are, I donā€™t see how the complete collapse of Russia is even remotely feasible. Those predictions add up to saying that none of the necessary pre-conditions have been or will be met. Together, they say that we have no way to coerce Russia into the desired state and we have no way to re-align their interest to get them to do so voluntarily.

          China definitely wonā€™t swoop in to defend Ukraine against Russia. I think we can agree on that. Itā€™s pretty clear the US wonā€™t either. I think we can agree on that too.

          Thatā€™s why Iā€™m wondering if you think the EU can get big enough to do so on itā€™s own, and do so quickly.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            2 hours ago

            i do not know if Europe can do it unfortunately

            I am thankful that Europe knows enough about 2 front wars to not give up on us in Canada

            Britain and France being nuclear powers and Germany having strong manufacturing may pose enough of a risk that they avoid a hot war and continue disinformation efforts