• ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I live in Poland. We have both of them.

    1. Soviet-era apartment buildings

    PROs:

    • everything within a walking distance (shops, schools, a clinic, etc)
    • a lot of parks nearby
    • fucking wind corridors
    • you can’t piss from your window to your neighbors coffe cup
    • you will see some greenery from your window

    CONs:

    • tiny
    • very low ceilings - you most likely won’t be stretch your arm upwards.
    • very bad acoustic - you can hear downstairs cutting green onions
    • a lot of apartments on a floor (and very tiny lifts)
    1. Modern buildings:

    PROs:

    • high ceilings
    • you can piss from your window on your neighbor’s bed if you’re into it.

    CONs:

    • … we have a whole wikipedia page about it: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patodeweloperka
    • I honestly don’t want to talk about it, it’s so sad. Generally speaking, bad quality (but deceptively good looking) places that cost too much, in a shitty neighborhood.
    • no wind corridors so say hello to air pollution

    Now, I know this sub tends to romanticize USSR, but during occupation (so until 1990) it wasn’t that you had an apartment for yourself for every single person. If we just want to consider recent history (like 1980) then:

    • your apartment wasn’t yours - it was tied to your job. Like US healthcare. If you lost the job, you would lose the apartment. They were also limited to at most 1 per family.
    • If you wanted to move to a different city to get a job there, then it could be impossible if the company didn’t have free apartments there. Often it didn’t. There was an semi-official apartment swapping market that often involved a chain of swaps in multiple cities.
    • In practice you wouldn’t get a bigger apartment if you had children. You could try to swap for it. Most apartments were overcrowded and multigenerational AND small. It was common for a 3 generational family to live in a 3 room apartment (not “bedroom”, room).
    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Other than the ceilings part your cons describe most American apartments.

      And people would kill here to have nearby parks and stuff within walking distance

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Ceiling part is also incorrect, i have no idea where that dude lives but i’ve been in a lot of different buildings from post war rebuilt ones, though khrushchevka to big plate and i never have a problem with stretching and i’m not short.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You realize that millions of people living in US and Canada would kill for that right now? It’s actually very common at this point for multiple people to share apartments komunalka style because their jobs don’t pay a living wage.

      Also, you create a false dichotomy here suggesting that if free housing was built the way USSR did it today then it would have to be built to the 1950s standard. Obviously there’s absolutely no reason why you couldn’t be building modern style apartments.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        komunalka

        also, I’m not talking about them. They were a thing in the 50’s (after the war) when people were sharing bathrooms or kitchens, they were no longer really a thing in the 80’s. In the 80’s apartments had their own bathrooms and kitchens.

        edit: isn’t that basically “Friends” for USA people? :D

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Also, you create a false dichotomy here suggesting that if free housing was built the way USSR did it today then it would have to be built to the 1950s standard.

        I was describing buildings from the `80.

        Obviously there’s absolutely no reason why you couldn’t be building modern style apartments.

        … so the ones I described as “so many cons that I’m too sad to talk about them and we have a separate wiki page to describe how awful they can get”?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I was describing buildings from the `80.

          Everything I said in my comment still applies if you replace 50 with 80 in it.

          … so the ones I described as “so many cons that I’m too sad to talk about them and we have a separate wiki page to describe how awful they can get”?

          Once again, you don’t seem to understand the simple fact that millions of people in the west have it worse right now.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    They didn’t get to choose the apartment they lived in, they couldn’t own them, they were often basic with communal kitchens and bathrooms. It’s a good thing they were free because the wages were low, and people were assigned jobs so there was little they could do to improve their careers, not that skilled people got paid much more.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I mean… What’s worse, what you’ve described, or paying 50% of your income for a basic apartment or else run from bulldozers as a homeless person? At least people had shelter.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Also all his statements are mostly lies. First was only true for a period where the country was rebuilding after nazi invasion which turned the most developed and inhabited cities into rubble; low wages are relative, they were low in dollars, but liveable due to low costs of living; assigning jobs was only true for people which didn’t found jobs themselves (which was incredibly easy compared to capitalism). There was also possibility to refuse any job whasoever, it resulted in classification as “social parasite” and more or less frequent harrassment by militia, but even then they still get some help from social services and had free healthcare and weren’t evicted.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Could I trouble you for some citations?

      they were often basic with communal kitchens and bathrooms

      The horror, the horror. A building made a decade after a sixth of their population and most of their infrastructure was destroyed by a capitalist invasion and there was communal amenities. Also do you prefer to cook alone?

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      youre right, a soviet one wouldnt be reduced to ashes during a fire, not a fair comparison.

  • Luckiesock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Freedom and human rights are shit down the drain and heads straight to soviet kitchen.

    It boggles my mind how people today can support such an evil ideology, just because current times are difficult.

    Might I suggest moving tf to North Korea, or perhaps don’t move to a Liberal cesspool of a city and update the folk online with your personal dilemmas?

    Src: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_Soviet_Union

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Implying our cities suck because they lean left and not because they’ve been built for cars instead of people

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Remind me, what was the first European country to legalize abortion? Oh, after that, what was the second country to legalize abortion?

      When did soviet women get the right to divorce their husbands?

      What was the literacy rate before the soviet union? What was it after? Answer the same questions about women’s literacy.

      What was the schooling rate before the soviet union? What was it after? Answer the same questions about women’s schooling.

      What was the college graduation rate before the soviet union? What was it after? Answer the same questions about women’s college graduation.

      What was the first European state to decriminalize homosexuality? How did the Stasi respond to gay civil rights protestors? What did Castro do upon learning that gay people were being mistreated in (alternative to conscription) labor camps? All of this decades before Lawrence V Texas. Hell, trans people got free transition care in Cuba before Lawrence V Texas. The socialist record on LGBT rights isn’t perfect but it is better than capitalist countries. I mean, hell, look at the way capitalist Germany treated lgbt people during the holocaust.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Huh, TIL. The main point still stands that the soviet union actually made a lot of progress on human rights, even compared to imperialist countries with more accumulated capital.