Doesn’t even need that. If Boris is in the foyer, I’m answering the front door. If push comes to shove and I’m killed at the front door, they already know a threat exists. Then they enter the house and attempt to detain Boris.
Gotta ask though, if it needs to be shot to go off, is that really a booby trap? I have draino in my house, that isn’t a trap. Maybe you have to put a sign on it saying don’t shoot?
I just wonder where the line is. Is it intent to harm. So if say the thing was a gift, and they didn’t know it was explosive. Would that absolve the person of guilt. Maybe it goes to manslaughter in that case?
deleted by creator
If Boris is being shot and explodes, the likelihood of the home owner already being killed by ICE or other agents is pretty high.
deleted by creator
Doesn’t even need that. If Boris is in the foyer, I’m answering the front door. If push comes to shove and I’m killed at the front door, they already know a threat exists. Then they enter the house and attempt to detain Boris.
I don’t think borris needs to explode for him to be discovered and you to be charged lol
If I’m dead, who are they charging? And who’s charging me when Boris kills the rest of them who killed me?
If he doesn’t explode, why have you and everyone else died?
ICE has a tendency to randomly kill people.
I feel like you got my point and you’re just kidding around, but just in case:
It’s not subtle, it’s probably going to be discovered and you arrested before it has an opportunity to serve it’s purpose
If American federal agents showed up at my door it would be an international act of war.
ICE agents already in Canada.
It’s not out of the realm of possibility.
Gotta ask though, if it needs to be shot to go off, is that really a booby trap? I have draino in my house, that isn’t a trap. Maybe you have to put a sign on it saying don’t shoot?
deleted by creator
There’s a lot of reasonableness and average person would expect in law, but needing a supersonic bullet to hit it is well out of reasonable territory.
I just wonder where the line is. Is it intent to harm. So if say the thing was a gift, and they didn’t know it was explosive. Would that absolve the person of guilt. Maybe it goes to manslaughter in that case?
deleted by creator
I’m not debating that a person would lose. Just pondering where the line between losing and winning might fall. Any thoughts on that?