• Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 个月前

    that… isn’t good tho. Like sure it adds “details” but I bet this is going to make lightning wacky other places.

    “artistic intent” is dead

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 个月前

      The artists don’t really have to make it an option if they don’t want to.

      • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 个月前

        isnt this a shareholder decision? i.e. not the artists choice? 😅

        but yes, and hopefully most people will turn off this stuff for looking ugly 🤷 but probaby mostly cus they cant afford it

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 个月前

          If you’re working under shareholders who don’t respect your artistic integrity, you’re not getting any artistic freedom anyway.

          • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 个月前

            eh, if it pays you usually would. You would be responsible for presenting a finished artistic product, while maybe not your vision it would be within the scope I’d say.

            wheras here it’s… just slapped on afterwards by an algorithm that changes, will change and neither you nor shareholders can control how it looks.