Iām not European. Youāll understand fast enough why many countries do this when the US gets a wannabe king, because the position isnāt taken š
Lmao okay so youāre implying that any State without a monarch is susceptible to someone claiming a nonexistent crown? Like its some sort of natural law like entropy?
I really donāt think so. Many of the countries you think of as more democratic have a Monarch as head of State, because itās understood between the Monarch and the people that if the Monarch steps out of line, the people will recognize it as obvious and kill them.
A dictator isnāt as obvious and as we see in the US, they change shit under your nose and their end goal isnāt as obvious as a Monarchās, so many in the population donāt recognize their intentions as being a power grab (sound familiar?). A Monarch undermining democracy is obviously wanting power back, a dictator? Well they could just be āDoing it for the good of the people š¤Ŗā. Most people arenāt stupid enough to fall for a Monarch saying they are grabbing power āFor the good of the peopleā, but are stupid enough to fall for a politician saying this, since they believe a politician is āOne of themā (as they ignorantly believe all politicians come from their class; the peasantry). A Monarch was, is and never will be āOne of usā, they were obviously never peasants, so less people fall for the BS.
It was historically what they agreed to. That is their purpose in modern times. Not hard to understand.
That is the purpose they adopted to continue to live at taxpayer expense.
Also not that hard to understand, yall Europeans can be backwards af about this.
Iām not European. Youāll understand fast enough why many countries do this when the US gets a wannabe king, because the position isnāt taken š
Lmao okay so youāre implying that any State without a monarch is susceptible to someone claiming a nonexistent crown? Like its some sort of natural law like entropy?
No fam weāll just kill him
You donāt even have the guts to kill him as he says heās a king currentlyā¦ gtfoh. You aināt as ballsy as the French.
Thatās fair, but I believe history will end on my side in this.
I really donāt think so. Many of the countries you think of as more democratic have a Monarch as head of State, because itās understood between the Monarch and the people that if the Monarch steps out of line, the people will recognize it as obvious and kill them.
A dictator isnāt as obvious and as we see in the US, they change shit under your nose and their end goal isnāt as obvious as a Monarchās, so many in the population donāt recognize their intentions as being a power grab (sound familiar?). A Monarch undermining democracy is obviously wanting power back, a dictator? Well they could just be āDoing it for the good of the people š¤Ŗā. Most people arenāt stupid enough to fall for a Monarch saying they are grabbing power āFor the good of the peopleā, but are stupid enough to fall for a politician saying this, since they believe a politician is āOne of themā (as they ignorantly believe all politicians come from their class; the peasantry). A Monarch was, is and never will be āOne of usā, they were obviously never peasants, so less people fall for the BS.