Musk poured a ton of money, time, and energy into this race

In particular, the race was seen as a test of Musk’s political sway, as his super PAC, America PAC, alone spent more than $12 million to support Schimel. He also traveled to Wisconsin the Sunday before the election, where he handed out $1 million checks to voters who had signed his petition against “activist judges.”

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Musk spending $25 million and also reduces his grip on congressional Republicans

    They have been worried about him funding challangers against them. If he can spend this kind of money and heavier time investment and still lose badly, that reduces a motivation to go along with him

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      But this doesn’t really have anything go do with my original point. I think Trump fully intends to disregard whatever court goes against him. State or federal.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        State courts can carry out arrests and penalties themselves without federal government involvement

        Primarily in the context of Musk that’s going to matter with his active cases in the WI court

        Other states governments can extradite him too even if he never steps foot in Wisconsin. He’d have to basically never go anywhere other than federal territories or deep red state to avoid that. That’s assuming they’d block his extradition in the first place which is quite rare to begin with

        • imrighthere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          State courts can carry out arrests and penalties themselves without federal government involvement

          Only if the stormtroopers want to. What do you think they’ll do ?

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Plenty of states are directly rubuking Trump right now and actively going against what he’s telling them to do. We don’t have to imagine them enforcing things that they don’t want. Many are already doing just as much

            Statewide dem parties have been better at standing up than much of the national dems have

            NY still has the congestion prices going despite his demand they pull it

            Maine’s governor is not bowing to Trump’s demands on trans rights even after direct in person confrontation

            And so on

          • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think you missed the memo that courts can deputize people as they need.

            If law enforcement refuses, the court will take necessary action. It’s just not very common since the 1800s.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think if it gets to that point, it might be a legit civil war. But I could see Trump enforcing his “laws” in a state against their will and daring the state to retaliate against his federal police.

          I’d guess there would be an executive order related to “free and fair elections” but also giving Trump power to affect elections. State courts will say no, federal police will disregard.