Summary

A GOP-led procedural vote in the House failed after nine Republicans joined Democrats, halting legislative action for the week.

The vote’s collapse blocked Republican efforts to pass the No Rogue Rulings Act, aimed at limiting federal judges’ power, and the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote.

The failed rule also sought to derail a bipartisan resolution allowing proxy voting for new parents, led by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna.

With the rule defeated, Speaker Mike Johnson canceled all remaining votes until Monday evening, stalling key GOP priorities.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure if this is Johnson acting immature and throwing a tantrum because the GOP couldn’t get their way, or if he’s buying time to make sure they can get the nine Republicans into line before trying again.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Definitely the latter. They don’t want to risk anyone else defecting in the meantime after repeated failures that make them look bad, so they’re looking for some other way to coerce the votes.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s just a rule they can’t vote on it until Monday. Which was the original schedule until Anna Paulina Luna used the arcane rule to move it up. She probably did that because nobody comes to work on Mondays and she didn’t think they’d have the votes. She worked with a Democrat to create the bill and had a baby just a few months after being elected. She left the Freedom Caucus over it.

      The 9 Rs didn’t like being pushed around.

      Or, just maybe, some of them (plus her) are the ones that some of the more quietly persuasive Democrats need to be talking to off the floor…

      Edit: Either way, I’m happy for anything that messes with the GOP pushing through their hate agenda. Delay, Deny, Defend us against tyranny!

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hold on… I’m having trouble unpacking this. Can you explain the math here? Did I read that this is all the result of internal GOP drama because someone had a baby?

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s a bit of “strange bedfellows” involved here. Two women, one D and one R, realized they and anyone like them could lose their opportunities to vote on legislation (ie do their job) if childbirth or neonatal complications kept them away from the Capitol Building. So they sponsored this bill.

          Democrats like it because it makes the job fairer to women. I presume some of the Republicans feel it fits their pro-birth agenda, and helps against women’s tendency to vote more left than their spouses.

          They may also like the part that Johnson hates, which is that it opens a door to further proxy voting. Which he says is bad because legislators need to be in the same building interacting with each other, (which we can all see isn’t doing shit for bipartisanship) but mostly that rule is used for partisan gamesmanship, timing votes according to who will be present. He doesn’t want to have to learn how to work with a change in the rules.

          Three bills got linked together as part of his shenanigans, so now all three are stuck until at least Monday.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      that is true to get them to toe the line, but i suspect its a distraction for the wisconsin judge fiasco.