Article intro:


President Donald Trump has launched the United States into a trade war, the likes of which has not been seen in decades. On April 2, 2025, the date that the president and his advisers are calling ā€œLiberation Day,ā€ the Trump administration is expected to announce a sweeping set of tariffs against ā€œall countries.ā€

The Trump administrationā€™s ā€œreciprocal tariffsā€ are ostensibly designed to charge other countries what they charge the United Statesā€”an eye-for-an-eye approach to trade relations. Given their regressive nature, the economic burden of the Trump administrationā€™s tariffs will fall on U.S. consumersā€”particularly low- and middle-income householdsā€”as well as on U.S. producers that rely on imports to manufacture in the United States.

White House aide Peter Navarro recently said that the administrationā€™s new auto tariffs, for example, would raise $100 billion annually and that other tariffs would generate $600 billion annually. This comes at a time when the administration is looking for opportunities to raise substantial revenue to offset the cost of massive tax breaks for its wealthiest donors. Taking Navarroā€™s numbers at face value, the Center for American Progress estimates Trumpā€™s tariffs could cost American households an average of $5,200 every year.

The Trump administration has already placed 25 percent duties on most imports from the United Statesā€™ two largest trading partners, Canada and Mexico; imposed 20 percent tariffs on Chinese imports; and last week announced a 25 percent tariff on all imported cars and auto parts. Taken together, these actionsā€”and the retaliatory measures they have already provokedā€”will cause significant damage to the U.S. economy. They are likely to reduce job prospects; raise prices for electricity, cars, and other everyday goods; and ultimately make it harder for businesses to compete in global markets.

This article raises questions about the cost of Trumpā€™s reckless trade wars for Americans. Will Trumpā€™s trade wars affect U.S. jobs? Will they increase or decrease working familiesā€™ prosperity? Will the administrationā€™s policies position the countryā€™s industrial base to compete effectively in the future? And, recognizing that economic supply chains and security challenges are heavily interconnected, what will the consequence be for U.S. foreign relations?


  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    ainā€™t gonna cost me $5k more a yearā€¦

    i donā€™t have that $5k extra to spend, so iā€™ll just keep on ā€˜making doā€™ with less and less each year. iā€™m already near the absolute minimum and close to scoping out a spot under a bridge by the river.

    • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      1 day ago

      You and me both, my friendā€¦

      Getting in all the Irish Whiskey I can now cause I fear it will be unaffordable soon.

      Good think I also enjoy Kentucky Burbonā€¦ šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        1 day ago

        When and where possible, Iā€™m refusing to buy stuff produced in red states. Which sucks, because I also enjoy bourbon. But anyways: I encourage others to engage in regional boycotts of that sort.

        • adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          1 day ago

          capitalism and corporate greed says that the cost of domestic goods will go up, too, to be just less than the now higher-priced imports.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    24 hours ago

    To be expected. Any company will think twice before investing in something that is only profitable as long as the random policy of the day baby in the White House keeps the tariffs up against any economical sense.