Article intro:


President Donald Trump has launched the United States into a trade war, the likes of which has not been seen in decades. On April 2, 2025, the date that the president and his advisers are calling ā€œLiberation Day,ā€ the Trump administration is expected to announce a sweeping set of tariffs against ā€œall countries.ā€

The Trump administrationā€™s ā€œreciprocal tariffsā€ are ostensibly designed to charge other countries what they charge the United Statesā€”an eye-for-an-eye approach to trade relations. Given their regressive nature, the economic burden of the Trump administrationā€™s tariffs will fall on U.S. consumersā€”particularly low- and middle-income householdsā€”as well as on U.S. producers that rely on imports to manufacture in the United States.

White House aide Peter Navarro recently said that the administrationā€™s new auto tariffs, for example, would raise $100 billion annually and that other tariffs would generate $600 billion annually. This comes at a time when the administration is looking for opportunities to raise substantial revenue to offset the cost of massive tax breaks for its wealthiest donors. Taking Navarroā€™s numbers at face value, the Center for American Progress estimates Trumpā€™s tariffs could cost American households an average of $5,200 every year.

The Trump administration has already placed 25 percent duties on most imports from the United Statesā€™ two largest trading partners, Canada and Mexico; imposed 20 percent tariffs on Chinese imports; and last week announced a 25 percent tariff on all imported cars and auto parts. Taken together, these actionsā€”and the retaliatory measures they have already provokedā€”will cause significant damage to the U.S. economy. They are likely to reduce job prospects; raise prices for electricity, cars, and other everyday goods; and ultimately make it harder for businesses to compete in global markets.

This article raises questions about the cost of Trumpā€™s reckless trade wars for Americans. Will Trumpā€™s trade wars affect U.S. jobs? Will they increase or decrease working familiesā€™ prosperity? Will the administrationā€™s policies position the countryā€™s industrial base to compete effectively in the future? And, recognizing that economic supply chains and security challenges are heavily interconnected, what will the consequence be for U.S. foreign relations?


  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    ainā€™t gonna cost me $5k more a yearā€¦

    i donā€™t have that $5k extra to spend, so iā€™ll just keep on ā€˜making doā€™ with less and less each year. iā€™m already near the absolute minimum and close to scoping out a spot under a bridge by the river.

    • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      You and me both, my friendā€¦

      Getting in all the Irish Whiskey I can now cause I fear it will be unaffordable soon.

      Good think I also enjoy Kentucky Burbonā€¦ šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        When and where possible, Iā€™m refusing to buy stuff produced in red states. Which sucks, because I also enjoy bourbon. But anyways: I encourage others to engage in regional boycotts of that sort.

        • adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          2 days ago

          capitalism and corporate greed says that the cost of domestic goods will go up, too, to be just less than the now higher-priced imports.