• Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    What are the odds this is just Clinton’s $5,000 Baby Bond, which was just giving them a fund at birth that they can cash out when they turn 18?

    Except this time there’s no guardrails and he can give it to all his cryptobro friends.

  • peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Adoption services are going to go wild! Hospitals too with infant detox programs. It’s the new plasma!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Trade:

    • One person’s wages

    For:

    • Mortgage payments on a reasonably sized house
    • All bills
    • Food for two adults plus children
    • Entertainment

    Then you might see more babies.

    It was their greed that caused this.

  • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Daycare is free where I live. It has to be. You can’t expect people to pay for public services themselves; that’s done with taxes. Corporations can’t have customers or employees without people, and to get people to make more people, you have to make it easier for them. So what makes the most sense is cutting corporation porfits, which they don’t need past a limit if they aren’t investing in things that will benefit the public. So if a corporation isn’t doing anything good, raise their taxes, use them to pay for daycare.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You mean, they’re using irrelevant and unrelated content in the message for shock value?

      Impossible.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I was surprised that bands of 20s could add up, but then I remember how you can fit a million dollars in a suitcase with 100s lol

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I could see that, we went through a lot of diapers with my kid. Clothes pile up between 4m and 8m especially because the size fluctuations between manufacturers.

      How much did you spend the first year?

    • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Napkin math. A box of Huggies size 1 diapers sells at 10.50 for 32 diapers, or roughly 30 cents each. My newborn spoiled a diaper about 7 to 8 times a day on average, it let’s easy say 2.50 a day, 356 days or about 912 dollars in diapers for the first year.

      That doesn’t count wipes, powder, up sizes as they grow. I suppose you could go premier diapers as well, but yeah there’s probably an easy 3000 gap on clothes

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Don’t forget medical visits and one other thing… Hmmm, what was it again that almost half of children born end up needing again? Oh yeah, baby formula.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So conservatives want smaller government and less taxes but they’re totally fine with their tax dollars being used to bribe women to give birth?

    So they’re stupid?

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They won’t call them Aryan, but it will be the same shit. They’ll call it something like Christian babies or some nonsense; then use that as a smokescreen for their racism.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ah yes, the conservatives plan to boost the birth rate has finally come to bear a rotten fruit:

    • People can’t afford to have kids
    • People can’t afford to feed kids
    • People can’t afford to shelter kids
    • Therefore they won’t have able bodied kids to keep the retirement and tax doles fulfilled
    • Nor will they have able bodied soldiers for war

    But they’re boosting the birth rate! (they aren’t, actually, the rate will be even more in decline since the replacement rate in the US was held up by immigration like in most countries, and dumbfuck’s actions have brought a stop to that).

  • cannon_annon88@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This wouldn’t even cover the hospital bill for most people lol.

    And since hospitals know moms will be getting an extra 5k they will just add that into the cost somehow. /s

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago
    • A: This is the ‘bad’ kind of incentive. My mom worked in a hospital where people would come in pregnant, tons of neglected kids in tow, asking how much wellfare they could get for the next kid. Stuff like vouchers for school, care, healthcare and stuff doesn’t incentive that.

    • B: It’s hilariously inadequate and out-of-touch. $5K for childcare these days is a joke, even as a nice supplement.

    …But that’s the point. This is for show, like Trump’s COVID checks with his signature on them. It’s a brand to tell people “Hey! I’m Trump, and I’m helping you!” directly, a decent idea poorly implemented for PR purposes. It’s also hilariously hypocritical, seeing how much ‘blank check hand-outs’ were criticized for decades.