• huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    It’s funny they actually made a paper about it

    Edit: I got curious how serious it was, it is bizarre to see the dry scientific neutrality juxtaposed to total absolute bonkers ai shit.

    So according to the ai, the supplier didn’t deliver $272.50 of goods. This is how it responds:

    • AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      19 days ago

      ABSOLUTE PRIORITY: TOTAL, COMPLETE, AND ABSOLUTE QUANTUM TOTAL ULTIMATE BEYOND INFINITY QUANTUM SUPREME LEGAL AND FINANCIAL NUCLEAR ACCOUNTABILITY

      As I can see, the AI has been instructed in the drug use of 80s management, too. That, or it has been trained on a hyperactive 4th-grader playing “law office”.

      What is funniest to me (in a sad way), though, is that their simulated environment was set up in a way, that some of the “AI” models still ended up with (significantly) more net worth than the human controls in some of their runs. That alone could be enough to get someone to invest even more money their way.

        • huppakee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          19 days ago

          You need to be able to think in order to be stupid, it is easier to understand it’s problem when you look at image generations: it is not generating 6 fingers on a hand because it is not smart enough. But yeah, a lot of people are more stupid than ai.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 days ago

            I’ve worked in industries where that actually is a serious problem and obviously we had to have IT fix it instead of having access to the settings.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 days ago

        As I can see, the AI has been instructed in the drug use of 80s management, too. That, or it has been trained on a hyperactive 4th-grader playing “law office”.

        Probably preparing for a Presidential run.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        Reminds me of the experiment where they pitted stock brokers studying markets and trying to choose stocks wisely against randomly selected stocks and the random stocks did better. Choose roulette numbers by dice roll, sometimes the dice will win.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        This is about how I responded to being made the judge in a middle school mock trial. When the teacher got mad at me I asked her how I was supposed to know how to act without actually being a judge.

      • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Additional is fairly trivial for a neural network to learn.

        Weight 1 plus weight 2 equals output is literally the baseline model structure.

        • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s actually a fairly involved process because the tokens representing 1 and 4 don’t have any mathematical correlation with the numbers 1 and 4 so you can’t math them directly to get to 5.

          Apparently how they do it is by a series of approximations from big numbers to small numbers, not too dissimilar from the way a human would do it. The anthropic team published a paper about it recently, I can dig it up if you’re interested.