• GreenMario@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Doubt.

    Haven’t seen a flip phone in use in ages and I work among the public. Even the barely functional elderly on smartphones.

    Who paid for this article? What’s their angle?

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    sponsored trash like this should be banned, along with the bot users posting it

  • skymtf@pricefield.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don’t trust these numbers, I really don’t trust any article that talks about my generation.

  • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    This I wish, but I doubt. I still have my old Garmin GPS and play with the idea of a flip phone but I’ve been spoiled by the smaller things like iMessage not dealing with MMS. It’s an idea I come back to occasionally, but I also think about going back to my Palm with AAA batteries for my PIM needs. Had one in semi-regular-use as recent as 2018!

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Has anyone found cell only and cheap service (<$20/mo)? (USA) If I have a feature phone, I don’t want data. I looked for years and failed.

    Edit: I had failed to notice I am in a thread over a year old.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The favored Nokia flip phone I have seen the kids using was still sub $100 unlocked on Amazon at the start of the year. It could be over $100 now, but it was definitely that low before. It was $70 when I got one for my daughter the previous year when she asked for a flip phone.

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    For the past 10 years I never bought a phone for more than 300 euros.

    I usually get a new phone every 3 years to have the latest tech and donate or recycle the old one.

    For the last year I had an iPhone 13 pro (usually goes around 1100 euro) as a work phone and my personal Redmi Note 11 Pro I bought for 270 euros and not once I told myself: Man, this iphone is at least 3 times better than my Xiaomi. It’s clearly a premium product but a middle category budget phone can match most features and even more. I still have a headphone jack, bigger 120 Hz screen, IR blaster and an amazing fingerprint sensor.

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    If I was not disabled with way too much time to burn, and where the weight of a phone is ideal, I would go back to a dumb flip phone like this. Smart phones are an addiction that, at best, must be consciously managed. Heck, I’m beside my workstation procrastinating right now.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    They all realized a $100 phone does the same shit as a $1500 phone… There is nothing they add to the expensive phones that justify the price

  • mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    As if we needed another sign that ZDnet was trash…

    I fucking hate these obviously bullshit articles. “Gen Z is using feature phones”, “Gen Z are using paper maps”, “Gen Z is doing XYZ”.

    No, they aren’t. At best some sad excuse for a journalist found a handful of tweets and wrote a whole article on it like it’s a “trend”.

    Look, I know “journalists” are being squeezed to produce at an unreasonable rate but if you write drivel like this then you have no business calling yourself a journalist, hell I don’t even think you can call yourself a “writer” or “contributor” either. It barely passes as writing and you are contributing nothing to society.