• HorreC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just dont think that it is how the law is written to work, if I can forgive you for crimes not yet noted, then why not the other way around and charge you for crimes not actually done (read: thought crime).

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You are pardoned for an activity, not a particular charge.

      If it were the other way around, then prosecutors would simply refile the case with different charges.

      • HorreC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But the pardon implys the activity was against the law at the time, and they were doing so knowingly.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          No, pardons do not imply guilt.

          Pardons can be issued when someone is believed to be innocent of any wrongdoing.

      • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, this is exactly the point here everyone. The pardons work because nobody has asked anyone if these blanket pardons are indeed legit.

        So we can all sit here and try to mince the logic of such, but the real answer is that it exists in a superposition of legal and not legal until the various courts rule upon it.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The SCOTUS has already answered your question:

          The power of pardon conferred by the Constitution upon the President is unlimited except in cases of impeachment. It extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.

      • HorreC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Which is because they didnt wanna smear the office of the president, and they control the DOJ. We should just move that to a 6 year cycle election. But even then its not like election are by an informed people to start so I guess this is just fucking another thing that we can be like we are fucked on.

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I guess because the outcomes are unaffected.

      Either they did the crime, and the pardon is doing what it was designed to do. Or they didn’t and it’s not having any effect.

      In this case, I imagine the pardons are “witch-hunt for revenge” immunity, given what’s possibly coming down the pipe.

      • HorreC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        oh I am 100% sure, but on the other hand the ‘news’ could claim ‘look Fiuci was guilty of making covid to start, they had to pardon him’

        • essell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s true.

          But they could also do that without evidence sadly. The really sad part is that people would believe them either way