• MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    There is one thing that is vital that is missing from peertube. Effective monetization.

    By watching on peertube I am a drain on resources. A net negative. I’d happily pay to offset those costs and more, but I want it to be shared amongst multiple creators and hosters.

    I don’t want to just support one, I want to support most of the network for the hosting and bandwidth, and a certain amount divided amongst the creators I watch.

    If PeerTube introduces some sort of payment / monetization solution, it might get more creators as well. Without it I can’t see it growing fast enough to compete with YouTube in the near future.

    Well… Sooner or later the costs of Full HD compressed video will be negligible for hosting and bandwidth, so that might be when YouTube gets a real challenge. So I guess we’ll see

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I remember the pre-Youtube internet where we created content because it was fun or educational, not because we needed money for the task of doing so.

      Paying for server costs and maintaining them, sure. MetaFilter has a good system for that, they’re effectively a non-profit and have a donation structure and paid admins and moderators. The rest of the people on the site, they just make good content for the sake of making good content, not because they feel the need to be paid for their time doing it.

      God I miss the pre-Youtube era. “Content creators” looking for a payday via advertising are a fucking cancer.

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I mean, sure but we are past that. No large YouTuber will give up getting paid, and go to a system with a much smaller user base so even stuff like affiliate links and sponsorships are worth less. Basically double lose money just to join peertube. Especially since most large YouTubers have a team of people who they pay, so they cannot afford for their employees sake to take such a large loss just to support peertube.

        More likely this leads to Vimeo, or like twitch TikTok or something else being able to support a normal video platform than it leads to people using peertube.

        • monarch@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I will never understand people who identify as leftist that refuse to understand that under our current economic model people require money to survive and if they do not get money for doing their creative work they might not be able to continue making that work.

          It is not selfish to want to be payed for working on something like a video that in some cases takes hundreds of man hours of work to complete. There is a reason that the quality of content available on youtube has gone up massively. Say what you want about the writing but there is no way that something like helluva boss could ever have been made entirely online before youtube.

          • nyamlae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It is not selfish to want to be payed for working on something like a video that in some cases takes hundreds of man hours of work to complete

            Yes, it is, if your desire to get paid causes you to remain on corporate-controlled social media, to the detriment of society.

            Not to mention, plenty of people can and do put hundreds of hours of work into projects that they don’t ask for payment for.

            “Content creators” who get paid through advertisements are class traitors whose interests are aligned with the capitalist class. They will fuck over society to make a buck for themselves.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        MetaFilter has a good system for that, they’re effectively a non-profit and have a donation structure and paid admins and moderators.

        MetaFilter has at multiple points been on the verge of shutting down, no? IIRC, you pay $5 for an account.

      • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I subscribe to a lot of full time “content creators” that are ad supported and supported via donations.

        I curate my feed meticulously to avoid slop, and I get a lot of value, learning and entertainment from those I follow.

        I believe they deserve to be paid for the tremendous amount of work they put in.

        Some sort of ability to generate a livable wage from creating high quality content seems reasonable, no?

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You can pay them. They can choose to require it. Nobody needs to pay a fucking gestapo in between