• Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s good, but I really wonder where all those people were during the last election.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean, a few million nationwide is high numbers to get for a protest, but not for a presidential election, with the size of the US anyway. I’d bet most of them probably voted. It’s the more politically engaged segment of a population that one would expect to show up to a protest, after all.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      About 90 million: ‘My vote doesn’t matter’

      e: bad %. It was actually much higher

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          In many of those states, if a fraction of the percentage that doesn’t vote did, it would matter. The numbers that’s based on (marginal percentages of known, reliable voters) mean the opposition party can’t unseat them, but in many cases, the doesn’t vote percentage absolutely can. Unfortunately a majority of eligible voters in those areas don’t vote for a variety of reasons, and that’s exactly why some people spend stupid amounts of money convincing you there’s no point in voting.

          • radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That works only on a hypothetical situation with no feedback loop. For example, whenever Texas is becoming competitive, Republicans invest more in turnout and they avoid the upset.