• Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Casual erasure of post-op trans people is really fascinating to me. Like, how did our culture shift from the first thing people think about trans people being “have you had tHe sURgErY yet???” to “if you have a vagina and are a woman you are cis”?

      • rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        i know this is an old comment, but i wanted to reply anyway. im sorry for my comment. i hadnt thought about post-op trans ppl at all.

        to clarify however, it wasnt the “first thing” i thought abt trans ppl, im trans myself actually.

        i guess ive had too much contact with pre-op or never-op trans ppl and too little with post-op ppl to have this on my radar.

        i will try to be better in the future!

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do women wanna be called “women” tho? I don’t mean this rhetorically, but as a genuine question.

    I for example, would hate to be called a “man”. It just makes me sound old. I would prefer being referred to as “male”, or anything that isn’t the word “man”. This is applicable to a lot of my friends too. Don’t women feel the same way?

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Apparently not. The world would be a much better place if we all stopped making such a big deal about specific trigger words and focused on the ideas being communicated. If someone’s intent was to be an asshole then sure, get the pitchforks out, but make it clear it’s the idea that’s bad. Don’t just scapegoat the word. If they weren’t obviously trying to be a dick then calibrate your response accordingly.

      To put it another way, if you’re upset about the use of a word that a scientist might use to describe something then you’re probably being overly sensitive.

      • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        science is often biased by cultural ideas. biology, medicine, and psychology, have been used to pathologise or naturalise things along social lines. this is also reflected in the language they created.

        i think it is important for this language to be reevaluated, as culture and the scientific view on the world changes.

        with the distinction between gender and sex becomming more popular, having compleletly destinct words might for example be positive…

        • ricdeh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          No, they are not for you to reevaluate because you hold no knowledge or expertise in these fields. Demanding for outsiders to interfere with the scientific process because of their silly little biases and mental disabilities is a deranged opinion.