Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I think it’s worse when they get it right only some of the time. It’s not a matter of opinion, it should not change its “mind”.

    The fucking things are useless for that reason, they’re all just guessing, literally.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Isn’t it a probabilistic extrapolation? Isn’t that what a guess is?

        • vii@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          This gets very murky very fast when you start to think how humans learn and process, we’re just meaty pattern matching machines.

    • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Is cruise control useless because it doesn’t drive you to the grocery store? No. It’s not supposed to. It’s designed to maintain a steady speed - not to steer.

      Large Language Models, as the name suggests, are designed to generate natural-sounding language - not to reason. They’re not useless - we’re just using them off-label and then complaining when they fail at something they were never built to do.

      • Urist@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Language without meaning is garbage. Like, literal garbage, useful for nothing. Language is a tool used to express ideas, if there are no ideas being expressed then it’s just a combination of letters.

        Which is exactly why LLMs are useless.

        • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Which is exactly why LLMs are useless.

          800 million weekly ChatGPT users disagree with that.

          • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            And there are 1.3 billion smokers in the world according to the WHO.

            Does that make cigarettes useful?

            • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Something being useful doesn’t imply it’s good or beneficial. Those terms are not synonymous. Usefulness describes whether a thing achieves a particular goal or serves a specific purpose effectively.

              A torture device is useful for extracting information. A landmine is useful for denying an area to enemy troops.

              • Urist@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                A torture device is useful for extracting information.

                No it fucking isn’t! This is a great analogy, actually, thank you for bringing it up. A person being tortured will tell you literally anything that they believe will stop you from torturing them. They will confess to crimes that never happened, tell you about all their accomplices who don’t exist, and all their daily schedules that were made up on the spot. Torture is useless but morons think it is useful. Just like AI.