… now do Snowden!

  • Garibaldee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Amazing that he can simultaneously want to close both borders to prevent drugs coming in and then pardons the architect of the biggest drug selling website of the time. I would prefer the vast majority of people in prison including Ulbricht to be rehabilitated, and not locked up, but that is some real cognitive dissonance.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It makes perfect sense when you realize that Silk Road was the killer app that launched Bitcoin and the entire Crypto universe that is currently funding Trump’s lifestyle.

      Now Ross can dust off that old brain wallet and live large in his stash. When he was arrested, 1 BTC was worth $200ish, it’s now worth $100k. And he can make more dollars whenever he wants to by simply selling a shitty token.

        • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          44 minutes ago

          I know, I know, he picked up some garbage from a tree one time, so obviously the multi-million dollar drug kingpin is a great guy. I mean… this happens all the time, Trump has only been convicted of one rape out of the 26 accusations, so obviously he’s a great guy too!

      • Garibaldee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m sympathetic to people who were talking directly to a federal agent, except in the case of pedophilia. God forbid they just arrest the person for running an illegal business and not try to entrap them. By doing that they probably contributed to him getting the pardon in the first place.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ross Ulbricht? He was given a life sentence without possibility of parole for the heinous crime of operating a website that facilitated peaceful transactions between consenting adults. Meanwhile, murderers, rapists, and con artists get off with almost nothing.

      Here’s an article about it by libertarian-leaning magazine Reason, and some quotes:

      From a libertarian perspective, it is obvious that no one should go to prison for facilitating peaceful transactions among consenting adults. But Ulbricht’s grossly disproportionate punishment should give pause even to supporters of the war on drugs.

      Silk Road not only protected consumers against the risks of arrest and black-market violence. It also protected them against rip-offs through an escrow system that delayed payment until shipments were received.

      In contrast with the potentially lethal uncertainty regarding drug composition that users typically face as a result of prohibition, Silk Road offered some assurance that buyers were getting what they expected.

      As Forrest saw it, these benefits magnified Ulbricht’s offenses because Silk Road encouraged drug use by making it less dangerous and more convenient. Even if you are sympathetic to that view, a life sentence for a first-time, nonviolent drug offender is hard to fathom, let alone justify. It was far more severe than the sentences imposed on other Silk Road defendants, including people who actually sold drugs, as opposed to assisting those transactions.

      Forrest also seemed to believe that Ulbricht’s libertarian views, to which she repeatedly alluded, were relevant in determining how many years he should serve. As you might expect, she said his moral opposition to drug prohibition “provides no excuse.” But she also thought it was “notable” that “the reasons you started Silk Road were philosophical,” adding, “I don’t know that it is a philosophy left behind.”

      Hopefully that gives some context, but please read the article if what I’ve quoted interests you.

      I absolutely abhor Trump, but I also believe that Ross Ulbricht should be free and that we should have a path to legal consumption of recreational drugs.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because he was put in jail for over a decade for creating a website and he was made an example victim of the failed drug war.

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think its slightly dishonest to frame this as him simply “creating a website”. He created a marketplace to sell drugs on, I just don’t understand the sympathy. I feel bad for low level drug dealers in jail, this guy not so much.

        I would agree it could’ve been handled differently, same with every other aspect of the war on drugs. But celebrating this guy is a step too far for me.

        • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Do you know what a website is? I guess we should shut down Facebook because of crimes facilitated thru them?

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Fair enough. The way I see it though is he made the drug trade incredibly safer because there were forums dedicated to drug testing, the stuff you got. You didn’t have to meet up with people in shady back alleys to purchase the drugs. So reduction of violence occurred, etc.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    FUCK YES!!! VERY HAPPY!!!. He shouldn’t have ever had to go to jail in the first place, but this is better than him still being there.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Exactly. He’s a first time, non-violent offender providing illicit goods in as ethical a way as he could. Also, providing hosting for illegal commerce shouldn’t be illegal, or at least shouldn’t have nearly as high of consequences as the people actually trafficking drugs and providing other illegal services.

      Instead of putting this guy in jail, we should be looking at making peaceful transactions legal. Me choosing what to put in my body shouldn’t be illegal since I’m only hurting myself