Movies are important aspect of the culture
You must log in or register to comment.
I mean they did.
Don’t Look Up was huge. It had an all-star, ensemble cast and was one of the biggest releases of 2021.
How many times do you expect them to best the drum?
If anything they beat the drum too much, I didn’t see “Don’t Look Up”, because of Trump Fatigue. Like so much media from 2015-2020 that got made had one note, and that note was “Orange Man Bad”, and I’m like “I know, I couldn’t be more aware that orange man bad. I did everything I could to stop it, but Americans are idiots.”
It’s like… I get it everything is fucked. You can stop blasting the despair in my face any second now.
Like I’m actually glad Hazbin Hotel got delayed for so long, because I just know Adam was basically just “Donald Trump with a harp and a halo” in an earlier draft, there’s no way in literal Hell he wasn’t.
The Day After Tomorrow had a dude that was basically a stand-in for Dick Cheney so Dennis Quaid could tell him that he should have done more sooner.
Waterworld, earth covered in water after the ice caps melted.
Geostorm took for granted that we needed a global network of satellites to battle climate change.
And who can forget The Happening or Birdemic?
Oh, you wanted good movies? (tho I lowkey love Geostorm)
Don’t forget wall-e
Many people forget that the reason everybody is trying to find a new planet in interstellar, is because climate change made theirs unhabitable.
I tried to watch that movie. But I quit it 15 minutes in.
What was even the point? It wasn’t funny, it wasn’t enjoyable, it wasn’t dramatic.
It’s like “look, here is a blatantly obvious metaphor on climate change” that’s our whole movie.
It seemed aimed for a very particular subset of people that wanted to feel a pat on the head or something. I feel like it’s the same people who enjoy that big ass climate change doom clock.
Just too much virtue signalling for my taste. Without actually making anything useful.
I disagree. The point of the movie is not to make people feel to feel smug, it is to provide catharsis for people who feel like the entire world is insane while simultaneously telling them that they are the insane one.
I think that’s a euphemism for “a pat in the head”. As I said, I think is a movie aimed to a very specific subset of people, of which I don’t belong. The set of people that also enjoy that doomsday climate clock that I keep bringing out because I think it gives away the same kind of emotions to people who liked that movie.
And for people that does not feel rewarded just for a movie, or a clock or whatever, saying to you “good for worrying”, the movie becomes nothing, it’s empty of anything else. It’s a very simple 75 million dollar message that says “feel better than others, feel special for worrying”. Also the whole message becomes a little ridiculous, when it’s delivered on the biggest media platform, with millions in budget, a bunch of famous actors acting on it, and then praised by millions of people.
To me it feels like those conservative figures that say that they are being cancelled while they are live on national TV. It’s just silly. And this movie gives the same vibes to me. Talking about the big ignored problem to an audience of millions of people that purposely went there to see the movie about the big ignored problem.
Your comment is now an extension of that movie’s plot.
It’s a movie, it doesn’t need to be “useful”. Some people were entertained, some people were emotionally affected. It was successful art. And we’re still talking about it.
I’m just giving my opinion on why that movie is bad.
I know that probably in the States now even liking or not liking a movie is a political statement, and that some people “like it” just because they have to. But it’s a bad movie. I’ve watch a lot of crap, and most times I power through it to at least see the ending. Imagine how bad had to be that I thought that it wasn’t even worth to try to see the whole thing.
The movie isn’t for everyone even if you agree with its message. It’s a really dry satire. I enjoyed it because the movie made me feel like I was going crazy as I watched it, and that feeling has stuck with me.
And the message went completely over the heads of the people it needed to reach.
the message went completely over the heads of the people it needed to reach
You had a series of very cynical and deliberately manipulative media coverage of the film which tried to spin it as anything but a climate change movie. And then you had a bunch of “man on the street” pieces intended to make viewers appear stupid.
But the core theory of media influenced economic change is rooted in the idea that a movie can shift people from their profit motives. No oil executive is going to watch a slapstick comedy and decide to shift his business’s core financial model because of a few jokes. No bank executives are going to divest from carbon emitting industries because some Hollywood starlets made fun of them. No senior member of political leadership is going to change how mining permits and environmental regulations are written because Adam McKay posted big numbers at the box office.
The Network didn’t change how Americans consumed their news media. Soylent Green didn’t cause Americans to reconsider our policies on factory farming. Jarhead didn’t cause any military personal to exit Iraq or Afghanistan. The only movie that seems to have really moved the dial on public policy is Idiocracy, the inspiration behind Elon Musk and Peter Thiel’s quest to get more IT people to fuck.
Maybe some climate change disaster movies are a good idea to make actually
Plus, disaster movies are fun
What was that one where the world was destroyed by climate change, but instead of burning everything froze? IIRC, the main character was played by John Cusack.
The one with John Cusack was 2012. California was destroyed by super earthquakes in that one.
The Day After Tomorrow? I loved that one
Who can forget the scene where they literally ran away from cold.
What a movie
