• heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Oh, it is. Basically some wine over “fml” so it’s more tolerable.

        At least they added caffeine, which is often added in weight loss remedies to bump up metabolism, and that does have some science behind it.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can substitute beer for the wine. Remember Kiddies, there is a pork chop’s worth of calories in every bottle! This is why diabetics prefer beer of a real chop! ./////JKing!

    This is NOT accurate dietary and medical advice!

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The white wine was for the eggs, which works, and the steak is just collateral because finishing the bottle.

  • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    1 bottle of white ~ 600 calories

    3 hard boiled eggs - 225 calories

    5 oz steak ~ 325 calories

    For a total of 1150 calories. You’ll need to be pretty active for a 5 lbs loss but you’d definitely lose some weight on this diet. Now I do not envy the heinous shits a diet of pure protein, coffee, and white wine will give you

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      5lb of fat is 17500 kcal. An additional 3450 kcal consumed brings that to 20950 kcal you’d have to expend in three days, or just under 7000 kcal/day. That’s Olympic athlete level, isn’t it?

    • new_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      127
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mostly of the weight loss would be water.

      No carbs plus alcohol and coffee is just diuretics

        • new_guy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Google results are showing to me that are at most 30g in a bottle of red dry wine.

          That’s like a potato or something

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        2 days ago

        Plus anything that was in your intestines / bowels. There’s no fibre in there at all.

        I used to have to “make weight” and water and empty intestines are the short version of how it’s done.

        • fox2263@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          So if we add some weetabix to the morning meal it’s basically a perfect diet! I’ll start experimenting tomorrow, I’ve already ordered 30 bottles of wine

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            2 days ago

            Is that true? It wouldn’t surprise me. When I was competing in that weight category sport I had a very skewed view of what I considered overweight (for me).

            99% of the population would have considered me lean as fuck when I thought otherwise.

            • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Unironically yeah. There’s more ways for a girl to pick up a restrictive eating disorder (family pressure, wider social pressure, more sports that care about weight like gymnastics and dance) but men can absolutely still get one and this is the most common way. And I really should have specified restrictive because binge eating disorder is pretty common in both sexes. Although orthorexia is also kinda coming into vogue for both sexes.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              I was going to say, sounds like the shit the wrestlers used to do back in high school. Always seemed wildly unhealthy.

              • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                2 days ago

                Imo weight class should be determined by an average of a bunch of weigh-ins for weeks or months before an event. Then, on the day of the event, allow some tolerance over the max weight but only if the average stays under. If the average creeps up into the tolerance zone, then they go up a weight class. Make the weight classes based on healthy habits rather than basically cheating in an unhealthy way to make weight a day before, then bulking back up to whatever weight for the actual fight.

                Not that I have any stake in any of that, so my say isn’t really relevant.

                • khannie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  There’s no good solution IMO. There’s a way to game everything. Ultimately it boils down to: You don’t want hefty people fighting little people. A 24 hour weigh in causes a small number of folks to go to extremes and a weigh in just before fighting could have someone fighting dehydrated.

                  Nearly everyone runs a 6 or 8 week run up to a fight where they’re constantly losing weight. For me it was pure numbers. e.g. I’m 7KG over fighting weight with 6 weeks to go. It’s a 1000 calorie a day deficit with maintenance days here and there and shift 2 - 2.5 by making weight.

                  You’ve 24 hours to rehydrate and it’s enough IMO.

                  The trouble comes when you’ve lads trying to shift 5KG in 48 hours. It causes death. Maybe a weigh in 3 days out then another with 24 hours to go would work. Tough nut to crack though.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you lose more than water weight in 3 days, it’s probably due to traumatic illness or amputation.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The avg person expending 2000 Calories a day means an ~850 Calorie deficit. 2550 deficit over the course of 3days. That allows about 3lbs of muscle (700C) loss or almost 1lb of fat (3000-3500C)loss.

        Up the calories expended via being active and you could reach the 5lb goal. With such severe caloric deficit nost of the weight loss would be muscle unfortunately.

          • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            If caloric intake was higher sure. Muscle breakdown is easier than fat so is a prime target in starvation diets to get energy. Results in long-lasting problems for people who have experienced famine or eating disorders. More moderate caloric deficits are healthier for a reason but obviously takes longer to lose weight.

            There’s a lot of variability in nutrition that can impact things but generally protein in the diet helps maintain and grow muscle but doesn’t affect that when your body is starving for energy muscle tends to go more than fat.

            Nutritional fads including the current lots of protein one are likely bunk or only for certain lifestyles.

            • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m not familiar with this so am interested; presumably there’s a calorie deficit where more fat is consumed than muscle? Where does it switch?

              • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                It is complex, precise dietary requirements vary person to person (even mouse to mouse but less for lab strains). As a generality women have lower caloric requirements, men higher. Age, height, weight, activity level, genetics, etc all have impacts.

                The timeline of caloric restriction matters. Muscle breakdown occurs first because muscles store glycogen which is a much faster energy source than fat. Fat breakdown can go on for longer as it has a higher density of energy. Simple short-term reduction in calories thus results in muscle before fat. Higher protein intake mitigates or prevents muscle loss in longer-term diets compared to lower protein intake as the muscle cells are used to process/use the protein. Exercise is the best at keeping or growing muscle as it turns them from energy providers to energy users.

              • 13igTyme@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Resistance training. When on a calorie deficit while doing weight training, you will lose less muscle. You’ll still lose some, but your body will try to rebuild the muscle using proteins and stored nutrients.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Depending where you start it would probably keep up a 2 to 3 pound a week loss until you get down to around 120lbs, then it would slow down.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s been around since Ancient Rome. They didn’t call it psychology, but where they put the Flavian Arena (aka. “The Colliseum”) is done to increase patronage. Additionally, stoking the crowd to foment an opinion agreeable to the State (e.g. the Emperor in Ancient Rome) was strong using theatrics.

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s the difference between a boiled egg and a poached egg? Theyre both just the egg cooked in water one with shell and one without

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I like how it says “if necessary.” Like what possible scenario exists where it’s necessary to poach an egg instead of hard boiling it lol

      • jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you’re staring at that hardboiled egg thinking. “I can’t do it. I can’t eat one more of those…”

        Fine, if you’re going to be a baby about it, poach it, instead

      • lyrial@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I imagine that eating exactly the same thing for multiple days would get tiring to say the least, so at least a different preparation would be welcome. Probably not necessary in the literal sense, but in the sense that you “need” something different.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        maybe if the shell got a bit cracked before cooking? Might as well poach it at that point since it’ll just leak a bunch of albumen into the pot anyways

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m all for morning drinking, but pairing a dry white with boiled eggs just doesn’t seem like a good match