- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Free speech advocates are sounding the alarm about a bill in the US House of Representatives that they fear could allow Secretary of State Marco Rubio to strip US citizens of their passports based purely on political speech.
The bill, introduced by Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), will come up for a hearing on Wednesday.
I can’t believe I wasted 13 months of my life serving as a Marine in Vietnam for this country.
It was the same back then. Years ago, a Vietnam Vet Draftee told me that he never understood why he was fighting in Vietnam, until he had to run an errand back to the port where supplies were coming in. He saw them unloading entire cargo ships of Budweiser beer, and he instantly understood why the war was dragging on - it was good for business.
I watched Superman: Red Son last night. Throughout the entire movie I was wondering what the plot resolution would be.
In it, Stalin is enriching himself while killing millions (just like real life). Superman finds it appalling that Stalin’s only response is “it’s necessary.” In the US, Lex Luthor is doing typical capitalist bullshit just getting rich and getting power.
But LEX LUTHOR ends up doing it all for altruistic reasons because even Superman can’t create a perfect society without harming dissenters. At the end, instead of continuing the altruistic steps, he steps down from power for his VP to do it and fucks off to a private island with billionaire stuff.
What I got out of it? Capitalism good, it saves you from gulag and brain control devices. And billionaires will save you.
War is GREAT for business.
Bayer/Monsanto will be so pleased to service the home front this time.
Perhaps we can at least say that your heart was in the right place depending on your personal goals. It’s even possible that your work bought additional time which does matter even though ultimately we had the current collapse.
I don’t think it’s all bad. But it’s definitely a shame that we’re at this point.
Committing war crimes for thugs?
Um, this literally goes entirely against 1st Amendment. That’s literally all about free speech. To be able to comment or criticize politicians and politics without government retaliating. And now they want to do that exactly. These fuckers straight want a dictatorship.
The courts have been cancelled so do not expect them to defend the constitution. Even if they do they will allow loopholes to allow it anyway, as preposterous as their reasoning will be.
It is clear they are idealogues on the courts, but also that they are compromised by the admin, career ending dirt on them. Just like the borgia pope appointing compromised cardinals, and compromising existing ones with prostitutes.
Earning himself the nickname of the whoremaster of rome. Borgia pope is early 16th century, that machavelli’s the prince was based on.
It’s literally Congress making a law that penalizes free speech. I genuinely can’t believe we’re here.
Remember when republicans carried around those vest pocket copies of the constitution - they were keeping them handy to use to wipe their asses.
They’ll label you a terrorist first
deleted by creator
How do you propose confederates not gaining power when their ideas are not only popular but celebrated and worshipped?
Actually vote
Their ideas aren’t popular, Trump won because the economy sucks the Democratic party sucks and the media sucks. Fix any of those three problems up a bit and they lose.
All easier said than done, but let’s define the problem properly. It isn’t that people on average are bad and can’t handle democracy, it’s that our systems are bad and manipulating people into supporting bad things.
He also rigged the election
Xenophobia seems pretty popular.
Eh. Trump was able to make a very specific and tangible case to his voters for how he was going to directly improve their lives. Kamala was completely unwilling to do that. That’s why she lost.
Trump’s plan was evil, but it was clear and direct. His message was “I will deport a bunch of immigrants and slap up tariffs. This will make it easier for you to get a job and buy a home.” It’s a cynical, evil, and short-sighted plan, but it was actually a plan to directly improve the living standards of working class Americans.
What was Kamala’s equivalent? Nothing. She had some vague language about a tax credit that would just inflate the housing bubble higher, and she took the usual idiot liberal approach of attaching dozens of strings that made it so only select marginalized people would qualify for it. Kamala offered nothing. People were hurting, and she offered them nothing. She didn’t lose because of Gaza, no matter what Republican trolls on Lemmy like to say. She lost because she was unable to make a clear and specific case about how she was going to help the people that voted for her. Her only real core message was the defense of democracy, but it turns out that people see little reason to support a democracy that will do nothing to actually advance their interests.
Just like China, well done magats. You are the thing you hate
The thing they claim to hate, while secretly admiring it (or not so secretly)
“When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it. Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak.” -donald trump
didnt even tried to hide it
“Land of the free.”
“Terms and conditions may apply.”
Land of the fee.
And the home of the slave
Under the regime, everyone is free. It’s just that more people are free-er than others.
Yeah this just shows you don’t have any rights. You have temporary, revocable privileges, depending on the whims of those exercising power.
Lmao turns out it was never about free speech at all. Just about control and power. Shocked
Removed by mod
Doesnt this clearly violate the 1st amendment?
The Constitution doesn’t matter anymore.
it got a 1 on its saving throw. sorry statesia
Fun Fact: Freedom of Speech is “guaranteed” in the Constitution of PRC.
https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/lawsregulations/201911/20/content_WS5ed8856ec6d0b3f0e9499913.html
Article 35 Citizens of the People’s Republic of China shall enjoy freedom of speech, the press, assembly, association, procession and demonstration.
Guess how that’s going.
(I mean you do have freedom of speech, you can say whatever you want, just not freedom after speech)
Please read H.R. 5300, SEC. 226. NO PASSPORTS FOR TERRORISTS AND TRAFFICKERS
To think we’re witnessing the repeal of the bill of rights, absolutely wild
So they want to keep people who say things they don’t like IN the country now? I’ll never understand the Bizarro world we live in.














