• Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reminder that SWAT was created in response to the black panthers. It’s a Jim Crow tool for dealing with uppity blacks that know their rights.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just here to point out that it’s not normal for a military response to some rando calling in a hit on someone’s house.

    A normal response is a check by a single police car with two officers. One to knock on the door and ask questions. The other to remain with the vehicle to call in any issues.

    This is a police state.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 days ago

      They probably reported to the operator an excess of melanin at the residence.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      It really depends on what the call in was.

      If someone says there’s an active threat and their life is in danger, sending 1 car would would be gross negligence and a danger to the officers.

      Now, this call, seems excessive. I dont know what would warrant that response even if it was an active threat.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s an argument to be made, but I don’t believe that is true at all. Sending one car to check on the safety/welfare of one active threat seems an entirely reasonable balance of risk. An unverified active threat is not at all the same as a confirmed active threat. That should be obvious simply by the existence of “swatting” as a common term and act these days.

        It is not the duty of police to protect people from eminent harm, they have argued this themselves in court. Their job is strictly punitive, again an argument they have made in court many times. They only pretend to “protect and serve” when it suits their agenda of justification for their over inflated budgets. This isn’t a public safety issue. It’s a class warfare issue.

      • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, you send one car first and have the other ready. It’s insane to send 20 cars instantly for an unverified anonymous tip. Idc if the caller said there’s an army of cannibals killing dozens of people, it’s still an unverified anonymous tip. If it’s real you’ll get more phone calls or the first car will radio it in.

  • 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    How the fuck is swatting even a thing?

    Can just anyone call the police, yell “BOMB AT X ADDRESS!” and they just show up, tear down doors and throw you to the ground???

    All, without repercussions???

    • FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not only without repercussions, but without reparations. Anything destroyed or damaged is on the owner to replace/fix, including the pile of splinters formerly known as your front door

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      What else are they going to do with all of that excessive money and time…and desire to shoot people?

    • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      In my state there is a law that makes false call to 911 a criminal offense. If someone says “there is a bomb” on such call, that makes it more serious offence because this will cause public alarm. If the person making such call is stupid enough to do it from their phone, they will likely be identified and prosecuted. And people doing stupid things tend to be that stupid.

      I’m not sure about damages caused by the raid, though. SWAT doesn’t know if the threat is real or not, so they can’t be held liable. Probably the victim can sue the caller, if they’ve been found…

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        How about the police do, idk, like 5 min of police work to verify literally any part of the story first?

          • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Uvalde was time sensitive and real and yet we have video of police standing around in the hallways scrolling through Facebook on their phones while children were being murdered just feet away. Those pigs didn’t face any accountability. Don’t forget police took cases all the way to the Supreme Court to have it declared that they have zero duty to protect people.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Call people in the neighborhood, ask if anything is off? Send in a single car to scope out the scene, while keeping reinforcements in the wings? Ask 911 where the call originated, and adjust expectations based on that?

            At least two of these things can be done while the police begins to move towards the destination, as intel gathering doesn’t require policeman to be making the inquiries, just support staff.

            0000

            Fact of the matter, is that American police are the same breed of ‘warrior’ that Pete Hegseth is: Bloodthirsty, undisciplined, incompetent, and in service to powers of capital and hate, not the citizens they are supposed to serve.

          • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Like what? Do you have an example?

            I don’t really believe that swat is necessary even in theory.

            If someone is being held hostage, call in a negotiator. If it’s a bomb, bomb squad. What precisely is the swat team for?

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Exactly. They treat this like a bomb threat when the perpetrator gets arrested, but completely gloss over the fact that the police are “the bomb” in this scenario and as human beings, they have full agency over their own actions. They should most definitely spend 5 minutes to determine the real situation but they dont because they never face accountability and just go off of whatever some random caller told them, especially when it means playing soldier.

        • 87Six@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Exactly, like asking “is the caller even in the same area? Who lives there? Is this place usually agitated?” Which seems like they would need to know before going in anyway…

    • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Cops live for that shit dude. They do it themselves for fun every once in a while, this just makes the excuses easier for them.

  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 days ago

    Another side benefit to The Drug War, the gift that keeps on giving.

    Hundreds of thousands of people are sitting in jails and prisons right now for using. Over three hundred thousand on any given day.

    https://www.prisonpolicy.org/graphs/pie2026_drugs.html

    This holdover from the Nixon era gets a little worse every year. Why do we have TWENTY cars available for any random prank caller?

    Are we safe yet?

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Don’t you feel fine having what is essentially a para military forced within the USA whose intention is to protect property and not people at all? I know I sure as shit don’t.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean… police has always been about protecting the rich…

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Info about Grandma Crackers’ fundraisers for her grandson’s cancer treatment and Phoenix Children’s Hospital.

    https://thegrandmafund.com/

    They also created a crypto token where the fees go to the previously mentioned fundraisers.

      • zeroConnection@programming.devBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Love it how banks managed to convince everyone that crypto is bad, so they can stay rich and in power of controlling your money.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          banks managed to convince everyone

          I don’t think banks have been in charge of the countless pump and dump crypto schemes in recent years. And Bankman-Fried (despite his name) wasn’t running a bank.

          • zeroConnection@programming.devBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            You know why there’s much less fraud with banks? Because they’re regulated. You know why crypto is not regulated? Because banks don’t want it, it’s bad for business.

            And if you think billionaires/bankers won’t do everything in their power to hold on to that power and money, including campaigns to make crypto look bad, and everything in their power to hide their own crimes, you are are heavily misguided.

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              I didn’t say “banks good”, I said “crypto bros (also) bad”. You don’t think the ones running the crypto schemes are also “greedy corrupt pedophiles”? Maybe you’re “heavily misguided”.

              • zeroConnection@programming.devBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                Dude, did you not know that most cryptos, the good ones, are decentralised. Tell me, who owns BTC? Spoiler alert - no one.

                Are cryptos perfect? No, but you should really educate yourself about cryptos, beyond the Facebook posts you saw.

          • zeroConnection@programming.devBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Oh, I didn’t know that billionaires are honest and law abiding people. Not some greedy corrupt pedophiles, no no no.

            “Please, Mr. Billionaire, take my money, I know you will do good things with it. I’ll even kiss your boots to take my money.”

  • Dvixen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Props to Grannycrackers for handling the aftermath with such grace and humour. Not sure I would be half as composed as her. (Or half as chuffed at getting to ride in a police car.) Hope she smashes her fundraising target.

    Looking forwards to the news of the arrest of the no-lifer who swatted her.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      It doesn’t say. I did find another article that says it’s for her grandson’s cancer treatment so it might be an ongoing thing.

      EDIT: I found this. Looks like she also donates money to Phoenix Children’s Hospital

      https://thegrandmafund.com/

  • Twerp10@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Is she using X-ray and macros or something to cheat at Minecraft? Seeing very little discussion of the video.