• jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you build a factory someplace, the factory consumes a lot of resources and can be a nuisance. But in return, it provides jobs; at the very minimum. Going beyond that, usually someone in the corporate heirarchy is smart enough to realize that building good will with the neighbors is important and they encourage the employees to give back to the community to that end.

    The actual impact may vary but if nothing else, symbolic gestures that say, “we know our presence here has an impact and we want to make sure it’s a positive impact as much as possible.” tend to go a long way in terms of winning support and acceptance from the community.

    Data centers consume lots of resources and can be a nuisance. Unlike other operations, they provide very few long term jobs and give basically nothing back to their host community beyond that. They take far more than they give back. If the “geniuses” who run these tech firms spent less money lobbying politicians and instead offered to pay for the college tuition of every student who successfully graduated from the local high school, they would probably get a very different reaction from the public.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      If the “geniuses” who run these tech firms spent less money lobbying politicians and instead offered to pay for the college tuition of every student who successfully graduated from the local high school, they would probably get a very different reaction from the public.

      Yeah , they could do a lot with their wealth. Unfortunately they are stupid and selfish. They’re playing a dangerous game and eventually they’ll roll for guillotines.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well the people with money don’t care about people. They lobby the politics so they can fuck you over and you are ordered by law to like it

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 days ago

    That is despite huge propaganda campaigns by tech giants and the government in favor of them mind you. Everyone who experienced what it‘s like living near one absolutely hates it for many reasons including health issues from the noise and vibration. Anyone who doesn‘t already got a taste of it when utility bills climbed up.

    Not hard to figure out why. There‘s an oil crisis and these AI bro fucks keep constructing giant diesel engines to power the giant data centers. Everyone else loses.

    • sanitation@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      There‘s an oil crisis and these

      they are selling our strategic reserves overseas while Iran is not over and we running low every day.
      I cant believe this.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 days ago

        What’s even crazier: Only 20% of the world’s oil production is affected. That means 80% are still available.

        It would be trivial to save 20% of oil, but we just don’t want to.

        People are driving just as much. There’s no push to home office. No push to make people stop buying crap they don’t need. No push to decrease flying or anything at all.

        Instead, offices are still uselessly illuminated all night. Useless ad screens are playing at any time of day, burning precious fuel for no purpose.

        We still throw away 30-40% of the food we produce. We still don’t have a massive push to pivot to renewable energy.

        Collectively, we don’t care about energy shortages, and politics and companies don’t either.

        Instead, we just price the poorer nations out of competition. We can afford gas at €2/l, and we don’t care that entire nations are collapsing right now because they can’t afford fuel at all.

    • GideonD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s the problem we have locally. No one wants these things, but local government keeps trying to push them through anyway because all they see is tax dollars.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    We are seriously going to need to stop being a bunch of weak ass losers and overthrow this corrupt government

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s coming. It doesn’t have to be that way. If we all grew a few edible plants in our yards or community spaces it would mitigate the damage of the planned famine

    • liking625@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      This, and the next, democrats facilitated republicans turn into this with their corruption. This has not gone from A to Z in a single government change. A government must work for their people, not just their rich or Israel.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    even R voters are up an arms, they specifically built them in republican counties to avoid regulations. pollution, air temperature increase, electricity consumption, is hard to ignore.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I pass an anti data center yard sign quite regularly that is featured right next to a pro trump yard sign. It’d be funny if it wasn’t so sad.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    I get the feeling the 3,000+ data centers aren’t being built so everyone can generate slop, but instead are going to end up being the infrastructure for the digital cage. AI won’t replace humans, but it can certainly spy on them quite effectively. Big tech and the U.S. government have been trending towards a fascist merger of state and corporate power for quite some time, and the FBI’s recent partnership with Flock and OpenAI becoming an official member of the military industrial complex are not good news. I fear we are headed towards a historically unprecedented ability for governments to track and control the populace. No matter what, these data centers are not for the benefit of the average citizen.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      When was the last time you heard someone mention the NSA? After Snowden’s revelations, one thing that was pointed out was you need massive storage for all of the surveillance data. Interpreting text and visual data being one of the strongest abilities of this AI, it seems obvious that this is what the real push to make it omnipresent is for. All of our data to be fed into the machine to generate lists of dissidents.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      It seems they’d better hurry up and finish, because the natives are getting restless and sabotaging construction projects is really cheap.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    I would think any human would be opposed to a bunch of machines sucking up all of their water and energy just to make a very few people rich and powerful beyond their wildest dreams. I’m still not convinced that it is beneficial and why is the tech/business/media world pushing this so hard? Value means a happy community, not owning a yacht for your private island.

    • Impractical_Island@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s all topology, man. Well, technically entanglements, really, but you read The Buddha et al, right? Christ said the same ish - Server, Client, Holy Internet - just different pedagogy, just as occult leaders have done to teach the hidden throughout history.

  • 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I was listening to an interview today where they brought up the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (NAFTA). People were working these manufacturing jobs they hate and the idea was. NAFTA would make things cheaper for Americans which it did. The downside was it took away many more high paying jobs for the middle class.

    AI is like a second version of this law. It’s going to take away tons of jobs in the name of increased productivity with a reduced focus on safety.

    People talk about illegal immigrants taking jobs away but they should be way more concerned with AI. The profits from all AIs saved labor that saved labor will go into the pockets of a few mega corporations. What incentive do those companies have to provide spread the wealth around and improve the lives of those suffering from AI? It’s deeper than just one country. There is income other countries rely on that will stop flowing and they will feel the deep impact as well.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      ChatGPT, et al. are the “immigrant or alien” we should really be opposed to. They don’t even like pierogis. Like, what kind of monster doesn’t like pierogis?

  • usernametbd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The CEOs of these companies boast constantly about these technologies replacing workers. Those same rich fucks support active efforts to cut social safety nets to increase their own tax cuts. So people don’t trust them or the future they are building and don’t want to support it. This, on top of the myriad other negative impacts of data centers - what exactly is in it for us?

    The U.S. AI roll out is reckless and sloppy - prioritizing speed of development. Meanwhile China is focusing on efficient coding and development based on practical use and spending a fraction of the cost. American is creating an AI bubble unlike any bubble our economy has ever dealt with sitting on top of the greatest government debt in history. When it pops, the government will be too leveraged to bail us out. The rich will jump ship to their tax havens and the people will be saddled with multi-generational austerity. This is the end of a long road of corrupt business interests and billionaires strip mining the wealth of the USA.

    Fuck capitalism.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Meanwhile China is focusing on efficient coding models

      China coding is most often even worse than US coding.

      • usernametbd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I guess I phrased that wrong. I meant efficient coding as in coded to not be as processor intensive or bloated. Efficient models as you state. Thank you for pointing that out.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s a huge waste of money at this point, and the technology will become rapidly antiquated. The depreciation will be insanely high, while the software that’s requires it becomes much more efficient. At this point we already have enough data centers, we just need more efficient software and smarter usage.

  • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Americans as a whole are really fucking slow. The slop factory “industry” should have been eighty-sixed for its waste of resources before they ever built the first data center. It’s not like the costs weren’t known from the start.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even if the specific costs weren’t known, it would at least have been obvious from the start that they would be impossibly large.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I honestly can’t wait for the first people to set fire to these things. There’s no way the US people will stay complacent forever right? At one point someone will snap, no?