• emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I do not see anything to be angry or disappointed about?

    Verification badge was good, the dumb thing Twitter did was throw it away by letting anyone pay for it.

  • Mars2k21@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    idk man I haven’t seen anyone complaining about it on Bluesky

    This is a net positive, nice to have a social media where verification checks are…actually used for verifying the person behind an account

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If they are, and there isn’t anything to display it, how are were to know what’s been vetted and what’s slipped through the cracks? Especially on a new account?

  • einkorn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Bluesky, the decentralized social network […]

    Were only one instance exist or did I miss something?

    • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      As I understand it, the protocol has the ability to decentralize built in. But the technical requirements are prohibitively high to the point only large businesses or corps could afford to do it. I also believe (someone correct me) the company hasn’t switched on the functionality yet.

      • Drunemeton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Last heard (a few months ago) the cost is in storage. The protocol isn’t too complicated now, but it generates a shit ton of data, and IIRC you need a minimum of 3 copies.

        • mac@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Storage is cheap whwn it comes to webhosting and 3 replicas is honestly not much when it comes to enterprise standards. I think cloud storage providers like backblaze keep something like 9 copies of data across different mediums

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        my mom has always told me that I had the potential to work at NASA. but the requirements are prohibitively high

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        This is a little bit more black and white compared with the other responses. 🙈

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Anyone who is surprised that BlueSky is going down the same path as Twitter (X, not withstanding) belongs on BlueSky.

    • primemagnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If it ends Elon, I’m gonna allow it. If Twitter fails, his stock in Tesla will have to back it. If that tanks… he’ll have to work his way out of bankruptcy. Just squeeze….

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Oh, no doubt - but he’s no longer personally on the hook for Twitter’s $44b debt-loan!

            So when it eventually fails, it’ll be a corporate write-off and Elon’s wealth across Tesla and SpaceX are protected.

        • primemagnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That raised some eyebrows. Not sure it’ll hold just yet. Still. His world is getting smaller.

      • stardust@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah for the masses they will likely always flock to commercialized easy to use social media that reaches critical mass the fastest, so them being willing to move and keep moving is best we can hope for. For rest of us stuff like fediverse will be there to use.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think a few more people “get it” every time the cycle repeats, but also, a sucker is born every minute.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Right now, venture capital investments - same as all tech starts out.

      How it’ll monetize to become self-sufficient remains to be seen.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I just saw a group is going to start doing custom feeds with ads inserted. I blocked the account and every single sucker who comes in to say congrats and how excited they are about it. Fuck the lot of them. That said, that’s a third party, but also an example of what they could do.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There’s been a lot of impersonated accounts popping up lately, so it doesn’t surprise me they’ve opted to do something like this.

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Oh yeah, they are literally everywhere. And a lot of them are impersonating people that haven’t switched from Twitter yet to take advantage of it specifically.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      How come they don’t use the already built in domain verification? It’s basically fool proof to certify that an account is owned by a specific entity.

      • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s what Twitter had and most people on blueksy just want Twitter before Elon. It sucks but that is really what the majority of people even want. They don’t care about the decentralized stuff.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t see anything controversial in the article. Did I miss something? Just looks like a way to make sure the public figures and companies you are communicating with are who they say they are.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think the existing domain-based verification system is a better way of doing that. Something like Mastodon’s verified links might be a nice addition. This more centralized system is… not what I hoped for.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I didn’t sound like a centralized system from the article. More like they want a third party like Verisign or something.

        Something will have to be done as these platforms become more popular to cut down on fraud and disinformation. You don’t want people impersonating other people or organizations, or companies. Even if Bluesky starts federating to other platforms, just knowing that they have a blue sky blue check would be an improvement if you could display that check on other clients like mastodon posts.

        ICANN has already made a mess of domain names so I don’t know if relying on the domain is enough. People are using non-Roman characters to trick people into thinking a website domain is the real thing. Others are buying up all these random domains so you get things like medicare.net and medicare.org and medicare.com etc etc.

        I dunno what the answer is. Just rambling out loud in frustration.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I didn’t sound like a centralized system from the article. More like they want a third party like Verisign or something.

          It’s going to be both. Bluesky will verify users, but they’re also going to have other authorized verification entities.

          From what I’ve seen, there will be two distinct types of blue check- users verified by Bluesky will have one mark, and users verified by a trusted authority will have a different mark.

          Now who will those third-party verifiers be, and how will they be selected, hasn’t been announced yet.

    • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Verification wise there is already domain. But ultimately, it is too soon for the twitter exodus to get the blue check. All in all, this type of outrage is doomed to repeat with that type of central entity.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      It already has domain verification which is better IMO. Its more reliable and safer as you have to own the domain to use it.