Pavan Davuluri says the rising cost of memory is why Windows 11 will use less RAM, with work on the memory manager, WinUI 3 and WebView2.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Some devs in the big corpos got spoiled with so much memory, with feature creep they managed to bloat up once reliable programs.

    In 1994 and when I began compsci, I remember how memory and bandwidth conservation was then taken so seriously, where performance was a high consideration over eyecandy. That I once got hold of Creating Killer Websites (yeah, that book), which included a section on how to slim down images to make them download faster, as at the time nearly everyone were on dialup. Videogames were then equally small, they were mostly sprite-based and were easily fit into a CDROM, as other games had basic vector graphics and low-resolution texturing.

    • llii@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      which included a section on how to slim down images to make them download faster, as at the time nearly everyone were on dialup

      I’m looking at you, lemmy sidebar header images that don’t get scaled down after uploading and are often > 5 Mb.

  • senko@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    The effect is that OEMs are bringing 8GB laptops back, and hopefully, Windows 11 won’t choke on it.

    8GB of RAM: the gift that keeps on giving. In 2005, you were basically running a supercomputer. By 2015, you were… still doing fine, honestly. Fast forward to 2025 and your machine is wheezing like it just climbed five flights of stairs while Chrome is open. But wait—2026 rolls around and suddenly 8GB is back to being acceptable again because everyone finally realized Electron apps were a mistake and went back to native development. Just kidding, we’re all doomed. Your IDE alone needs 12GB now.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ah, my mistake, i missread. It “will” use less memory (like, maybe one day).

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As AI, cloud-native development, containers, and open-source ecosystems continue to converge on Linux

    When the VP Windows Platform is telling things like that, it’s time to let it die already…

    [ ] Source

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    dude, windows uses paging even if it has a free bank of memory to use…i’ve seen it with my own eyes…it’s a complete trash OS…swaps like nobody’s business

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My Windows 2000 machine had 512MB of RAM. With it I could browse the web, run full-featured word processors, scan images, edit images, play 3D games, edit / compile / debug C and C++ programs, and so on.

    If memory serves, my office machine about that time only had 128MB of RAM. It was slower, but it could do just about all of that stuff, too.

    I’m not sure there are any broad categories of tasks I use computers for today that I wasn’t already using my Windows 2000 machine for back in 2001 or so.

    It’s hard to fathom where all the RAM in modern systems goes. A million somethings is a lot. A million bytes is a huge amount of information. War And Peace is under four million characters.

    • jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      My first win95 machine had 32MB, win98SE had 128MB, win2k had 512MB, and winXP had 8GB, my win11 has 128GB.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is why it is (often) so important that a new generation takes over. They haven’t experienced this as we did. They mostly don’t know.

      So every new generation is a new opportunity to pull off this shit.

  • palarith@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Haven’t we seen this movie from Microsoft before ?

    Let’s put out some press releases and then do nothing. It will be old news soon and no one will notice

  • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    11 hours ago

    All it took was a RAM apocalypse for Microsoft ro consider improving performance in Windows. I’m seeing brand new laptops on display being sold as Windows 11 PCs with 4GB of RAM.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s hard for the younger generation to understand, but 4 Gb of RAM is MORE than enough for 99% of tasks if your software isn’t written by lazy idiots.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 hours ago

        When the Raspberry Pi 3 first came out I was shocked how much it could do with less than a gigabyte of RAM (it technically has one gig but it shares it with the GPU). Linux is ridiculously lean when packaged right.

        I have an Android tablet with four gigabytes of RAM that sometimes crashes running Firefox with multiple tabs, something the Pi somehow managed with a fraction the resources. Windows often struggled with eight gigabytes before I upgraded.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        WinXP ran quite nicely on 4GB of RAM. You could boot to the desktop in under 5 seconds if you had a solid state drive.

        All the day to day tasks someone needs to do with their computers haven’t materially changed in the last twenty years since XP held the crown. In that time the speed of processors, storage, gpus, and ram has increased by literal orders of magnitude.

        And yet, somehow, things have become much shittier since then.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Because what used to be a native application that used 200 mb of RAM now needs to be a web application built on top of a browser using 4 gb of RAM to do the exact same task.

          I will honest to God pick fucking Eclipse over VS Code every single day, because at least it runs natively.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, I wish current devs would understand that I didn’t buy a shitload of ram for them to waste it. I bought it so I could have a shitload of things running at the same time. I currently have like 6 applications running and I’m using 20gb of ram ffs.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I still remember having a 4gb of ram on win7, and it’s enough for day to day tasks. The only thing that prompt me to upgrade to 8gb is games. It’s not too far ago MS recommend 16gb as a baseline for win11.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      4GB should be plenty for any general computing. I used to run Minecraft servers on under 1GB of system memory for an entire school classroom. It worked pretty well back then too.

    • sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My friend bought one of those, paired with I think 64gb of EMMC storage which is basically an SD card. It couldn’t browse the internet really with Edge in it’s default settings. I had to disable so much crap but I got it usable with Firefox.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It would probably run best with that really stripped down version of ChromeOS

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Nah, with 4gb you can get away with most linux distros with XFCE, and you could even do some indie gaming. Plus, using ChromeOS means you’re expected to have a network connection at all times (which makes things like using office suites locally a pain).

          • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’ve ran Puppy Linux off a 8gb flash drive on a system w/ 2 gigs of ram. It was by no means good, but it worked good enough.

          • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Depends on CPU, would love to have access to hardware like this to play with to see what it runs. But I don’t want to buy it without trying it first.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Bullshit, Windows 11 uses more ram than any other OS I know of. It idles an entire gigabyte higher than Windows 10, it’s still worse than MacOS although close, and it’s nowhere close to Linux Gnome, Headless, or even KDE Plasma.

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes, Windows 11 uses a lot of memory now. The point is that they’re working on making it use less.

      • rounding_error@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        “unused ram is wasted ram” is only valid when that memory is buffer/cache. Except the windows UI isn’t allocating excessive buffers or cache that can be freed under memory pressure or when an application needs it. It’s allocating actual memory pages for the JS rendering engine and other bloated vibecoded services.

  • mHtt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i got my windows install down to 0 RAM by using Linux.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Blindly deleting windows partitions while installing Linux because you know with 100% certainty that there is nothing of value on them always feels good.

      • mHtt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        i used to work in IT and I would explain to people the only documents or files of any value are the ones they themselves generate, because that means they are unique. Also the first rule of infosec is redundancy.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Until you find out that your favourite software has gone obscure and the single uploaded to internet archive is missing a disc.

          Lots of c:\program files out there with some cool shit in them.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Surface Pro owner asked if Microsoft would improve memory consumption, since they had to disable on-device AI services just to run a local model.

    A cynic would say that customers disabling Copilot is finally what forced Microsoft’s hand.