• bassad@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why not?

    Oil is a product manufactured by millions of years of stratified organic stuffs and high pressures, it is a concentrate of energy.

    TV is not as useful.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Generic mid-size sedan from Europe or the US. 64 liters. VW Passat or Mercedes C-class territory. E-class used to get 80 liters as an option.

      It’s so you don’t have to get fuel more than once or twice a month at most.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You guys subsidize milk, you should be paying more. And our milk is better quality and organic, Thats why we refuse to buy the crap from the US

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I doubt twenty years of ag gag laws have been kind to the industry that was partly responsible for the formation of the FDA.

      I’m really unenthused by meat and dairy in the States.

  • Furbag@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Lol you can see where the “I did that” sticker used to be…

    Wonder if it was an old Biden version or a new Trump version.

  • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    TV is cheap because you are the product. CEOs want you to see their ads, their propaganda.

    Gas is expensive because they have not yet found a way to stop car-owner from leaving the sofa in front of TV

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The tv should have always cost more. That’s part of the problem. America drunk on cheap consumer goods.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I can’t believe how cheap TVs are. I think I bought a 22” CRT 25 years ago and it was easily over $200.

    E: a CPI check says a $220 monitor in 2000 is $435 today.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Visit Japan or the EU and their fuels prices make the USA cheap. It is odd in the USA, most people are concerned about fuel prices, but healthcare costs are far worse.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Because you pay for gas every couple days with your credit card, while you pay for healthcare rarely

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        A large portion of US adults don’t understand the difference between simple and compound interest.

        Many are living with less than 1 month salary as savings.

        This results in a largr portion with neither the mental space nor capability (or both) to worry about 6 months down the line when they have to worry for 6 days down the line

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gas is a cheat code to decades of stored solar energy. It won’t be cheap for ever. Once you mine up all that shit it’s gone.

    Look at WV and their coal. Use to have 12 ft coal seams. Now all that’s left are hard to reach low quality 1-2ft seams. At some point it’s not even worth the energy to extract.

    • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are people who believe the earth regenerates and creates more petroleum… In essence it will never run out

      There’s probably a step g correlation to flat earthers

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It will! Just not within human life spans that’s my answer usually. Alot of their thoughts are grounded in something real. Its easier then telling them they are flat out wrong usually.

        Unless it’s the flat earthers

        • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It probably won’t to my understanding. Most fossil fuels are from large organic material deposits (usually from plants) underwater or in low oxygen environments where they aren’t disturbed/don’t decompose. Basically the conditions for fossil fuels to be remade don’t exist anymore so we really aren’t getting any more

          • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            There’s definitely location on earth where they will get generate again. Plus climate change only really means the extinction of all human life as we know it. Everything else will carry on, it’s not the first large level extinction event.

            The conditions that created it are likely to arise again. Most oil deposits are actually from innumerable numbers of planktonic life that built up on the ocean floor. Coal is from plant matter though.

            Point is its generally easier to redirect then reprogram people, with enough nudges they’ll start to see they are being lied to, or at least will know not to bother you with that specific subject anymore

        • Prathas@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Actually, Bloomberg Finance recently warned about how the cattle replacement level is precariously low in the US. It takes a minimum of a one-year forecast to gauge how many dairy cows will be born to reach milk production status, and apparently farmers are having a difficult time with all the debt and limited resources hampering them. Because of the US’s red meat addiction, we are currently at best only at minimum replacement, which is really concerning until the nation reduces some of its cattle consumption; otherwise, beef prices will continue to rise…

          • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Well we’re talking about maintaining cows for food at a sustainable level, the US is stupid in all aspects and should not be considered. The rest of the world isnt greedy and fat like Americans.

            As far as I’m concerned the US is an isolated dictatorship like NK so their numbers are al over the place depending on who is dear leader

        • texture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          it takes limited resources to breed the living beings youre talking about

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The fuck? Milk is 2x to 4x cheaper ($0.50-$1.00) than the most common gasoline, Natural 95 ($2.10) here. I thought you’d get something from those crazy “Got milk?” dairy subsidies…

      (Multiply by 4.5 to get US units rather than liters)

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          It’s fewer syllables, what’s the problem? And yes, milk is cheaper here than the same quality in the US (despite our 12% VAT) so I don’t see why “cheaper” next to it would feel wrong… And don’t forget that we don’t get the crap “regular” gasoline with as low as 87 octane rating, the lowest widely available one is 95. Similarly, 75 % of milk drunk here is UHT-treated, as opposed to 10 % in the US.

          • Stez@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            You don’t have much better gasoline there it’s just that you use a different unit for measuring the octane. They aren’t actually much different

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Well it’s partially true.

              87 AKI is widely available in the US as the minimum octane rating. That translates to 91 RON. I’ve never seen anything under 95 here in Estonia, or at least not this century. 95 and 98 are the only commonly found numbers. 98 is available in the US too, as 93 AKI, but not everywhere as I understand.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            because expensiveness is a scale that starts from 0 so you always know how expensive everything is. cheapness works the other way, so there’s no starting point. that means there’s no way to quantify how cheap the first thing is, in order to double that. in your example gasoline would have to be the least cheap thing possible, which means nothing can be more expensive.

            it’s like saying someone’s twice as short as someone else. half as tall makes sense, twice as short is a weird way to say it because how short is the first person?

            • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              “Cheaper” means “less expensive”. 2x cheaper means 2x less expensive, or less expensive by a factor of 2, or 0.5x as expensive. I can say 2x shorter, 2x slower etc. and I don’t see a problem. The adjectives “cheap” and “expensive” don’t relate to a number quantity called “expensiveness” or “cheapness” but “price” or “cost”, which is what the factor applies to, and the word specifies if it’s an increase or decrease. Everyone I know would understand that it’s the reciprocal of the original price, although I get that in a country whose president can say he slashed proces by 500 % without instantly having to resign, fractions and percentages might have to be specified but that’s longer to say for the same number of significant figures.

              Yes, I can find people debating “two times cheaper” (English) but not “zweimal billiger” (German) or “dvakrát levnější” (Czech), in fact the phrase is often used in promotional material. The only results suggesting it’s wrong are English Reddit discussions’ automatic translations to German or Czech, and Google’s AI summary that cotes them.

              I won’t stop using it just because people with inferior education sometimes don’t get it. Similarly, I provided the metric value and conversion rate, it’s Americans who need to practice mental math.

              • CriticalThought@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I won’t stop using it just because people with inferior education sometimes don’t get it.

                I doubt anyone doesn’t get it, it just sounds twice as unnatural to a native English speaker.

                • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  Whatever, I’m not convincing anyone with my use of metric and username. I’m avoiding some other weird phrases though, for example you won’t usually see me type “14 days” in English although Czech speakers prefer it to “2 weeks” (idk why, it’s the same number of syllables).