Vincent Oriedo, a biotechnology scientist, had just such a question. What lessons have been learned, he asked, from Harris’s defeat in this vital swing county in a crucial battleground state that voted for Joe Biden four years ago, and how are the Democrats applying them?

“They did not answer the question,” he said.

“It tells me that they haven’t learned the lessons and they have their inner state of denial. I’ve been paying careful attention to the influencers within the Democratic party. Their discussions have centred around, ‘If only we messaged better, if only we had a better candidate, if only we did all these superficial things.’ There is really a lack of understanding that they are losing their base, losing constituencies they are taking for granted.”

“We have set ourselves up for generational loss because we keep promoting from within leaders that that do not criticise the moneyed interests. They refuse to take a hard look at what Americans actually believe and meet those needs.”

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    181
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re missing the lesson too, ironically.

    The voters didn’t like what the Democrats were offering them, they wanted change, and they wanted it badly enough that they went ahead and ate that dog-turd-and-glass-sandwich.

    You’re saying “they shouldn’t have eaten that, the sandwich the Democrats were offering was better.” Okay, well, they did it anyway. So you’re wrong. The Democrats were wrong. They’ve been wrong multiple times now. They’re doing the “Am I so out of touch? No. It’s the voters who are wrong.” Meme.

    America’s a democracy. The voters aren’t wrong, as much as you might personally disagree with their choice. If you want a different government you have to offer them one that they’ll vote for. That may require some compromises, but that’s part of democracy.

    I hope that they get it this time. This is the second time in recent memory that they’ve made this mistake. Even Biden’s election was closer than it should have been. I really hope that the DNC gets its head out of its ass and cleans house, but articles like this are disheartening.

    • Majorllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I live in a deep blue state. Family is all very blue. They have learned absolutely nothing. They all think what the Democrats did was perfect. Kamala was flawless. She didn’t get elected because America is racist AND sexist.

      They genuinely believe that there was nothing they could have done to improve.

      I think they are gonna have to learn this lesson a few more times before they pull their heads outta their ass finally. I hope.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        And thinking like this is why the democrats are going to continue to lose, and minorities and women will continue to get fucked for it.

        Democrats, it’s the economy, stupid.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It won’t happen. Every election in the last 25 years, including midterms, where the democrats tried to play to “moderate republicans”, they got wiped out.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          and they keep trying to dislodge “sane” republicans because they’d rather maintain centralized power than risk a grass roots movement distributing power to the masses. dyed in the wool democrats prefer fascism to meaningful reform

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Obama was amazingly effective at the ballot box, but to the established Democratic power structure he was dangerous. Luckily for them he merged himself into their structure rather than maintaining his separate power base and taking on individual in-party resistors like Trump has, but it was a warning about what could happen and they took that lesson to heart. They do not want anything resembling another Obama.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              31
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yep, that’s why Hillary was basically in control of the party via Debbie Wasserman-Shultz and how much the DNC effectively owed Clinton at that point.

              People want to memory hole that aspect of it but it was 100% a response to the Obama presidency an attempt to grab a stranglehold on the party which she used to shut down Sanders and force her nomination. People often forget this is the same year the Republicans rejected Jeb Bush. America didn’t want Bush v. Clinton again, and Trump and Sanders were the only voices offering anything different. Democrats shut down their nascent progressive wing, and Trump just steamrolled the Republicans because he’s a fucking bully and those guys bend over and take it for bullies.

                • kreskin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Centrists cant even come close to winning an election without progressives. So it might serve your own interests to watch your mouth.

                  • BadmanDan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    Serve what interest? I don’t care if Dems win or not? They don’t pay me. I’ll say what I wanna say about leftist and MAGA. I’m not scared of you mfs

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You have to conclude that they’d rather chase after “moderate Republicans” and lose than chase after the left and win.

        • BadmanDan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          So if Dems are never left enough for you. Wouldn’t that mean they’re moderate. Which means they won in 06, 08, 12, 18, 20 and 22 being “moderate”.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            They won in 2020 on the wake of protests and low-information voters who thought they’d be freeing the immigrant camps, defunding the police, codifying roe, and getting free healthcare.

            They got wiped out in 22 by being moderate and getting fuckall done by trying to compromise with republicans for 2 years.

            In 06 and 08, they were finally coming about against the Iraq war and promising things, unlike in 2004 where they simply said they would do the war more competently.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        She didn’t get elected because America is racist AND sexist.

        This talking point is just so Democrats have an excuse to keep AOC out of the 2028 race in favor of some centrist turd barge.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            What has AOC done that Kamala hasn’t?

            Give a coherent speech. Talk about policy poistions. Pave her own way instead of riding on someone elses coattails. Have some basic principles and humanity. Have a staff that doesnt talk to the press about what a tyrant she is. Fight for whats right instead of what will bring in bribes.

            The two couldnt be more different.

          • Kalysta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Actually asked voters what they want rather than tell them bullshit lies.

            Stood against the palestinian genocide

            Wants universal health care. Pushed the green new deal.

      • Maiq@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The blue bubble is as heard to burst as the red bubble. My mom lives on msnbc. There is not a moment that its not on just like my dad lives on fox. They are completely in their own different worlds made of fiction. Dad thought there was no way Trump could loose to Biden just as my mom thought there was no way Hillary/Harris could loose to Trump. Both had no moment of realisation, no moment of reflection just disbelief that they live in a bubble. Its always someone else’s fault. Dad blamed the Democrats and mom blames the left.

        To me it’s obvious that Chomsky was right about manufacturing consent.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          MSNBC is liberal Fox News. They both are the circuses while the public is clamoring for breadcrumbs.

          To me it’s obvious that Chomsky was right about manufacturing consent.

          Always has been.

      • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Her fascist border plan, embrace of genocide, and her running mate Liz Cheney were all great in their opinion? Wow. I need to talk to some Dems sometime.

          • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Biden got 80 million and won on a much more progressive platform (that he ignored when in office). Harris ran a conservative campaign that depressed her base in favor of appealing to republicans. It was some sorkin brained shit that obviously stupid and many of us were yelling about it at the time. We were right but Dems will never listen because they love corporate money more than winning or having a livable planet.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              To be fair afaik Biden didn’t ignore his progressive platform. He definitely said things he then didn’t accomplish, but if I understand it right they were within the range of “all politicians lie” rather than having completely ignored his platform Obama-style.

            • Gsus4@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Most pro-labour administration since FDR, but that still counted for nothing, apparently.

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Because thats pretty debatable. Where was the Biden administration when the cops were breaking up the amazon strike? And Biden forced the rail union not to strike, right? And in the end years later gave them a fraction of what the strikers were going to demand, and called it victory. Typical centrist outcome.

              • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                17 hours ago

                It counted for nothing because inflation was hurting the working class and Democrats are shit at messaging.

              • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Ran on being compassionate to migrants, deported more than Trump and had Title 42 longer. Said he’d get rid of private prisons, those migrants end up in private prisons.

                Ran on cleaning up Trumps mess with Covid, just declared it over with while Americans died in droves. Didn’t even try to mitigate it. His press secretary had the gall to laugh when a reporter suggested sending free tests which they ended up doing because of public pressure.

                Ran on cleaning up Washington after Trump. Appointed the most useless man in the word Merrick Garland who sat on his fucking hands until Trump rehabilitated his image. Speed was key and Biden might just be responsible for the end of American democracy because of his lack of spine.

                Ran on the energy from the George Floyd protests. Solved the problem of policing of black people by funding the living shit out of cops. I assume he is trying to drown them in money.

                Then he funded the shit out of genocide that his base fucking hated. Just from a pragmatic point of view he should have stopped for the elections sake, but he did it anyways because he doesn’t think Palestinians are people.

                I was Biden’s biggest fan after the IRA passed. Finally we are doing something for the environment. But that is all going to be undone because the fuck refused to step down so we could have a primary.

                • Gsus4@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  And yet he was still the most humane president since Carter. Really tells you something about the US, more than the president himself (e.g. Congress standing ovation for genocide bibi).

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Harris has a lot of flaws, but America is absolutely racist and sexist, and Trump couldn’t have won otherwise. .

      • BadmanDan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Your family is correct. America is racist and sexist. Asl yourself, after that debate and the several Trump fumbles on the campaign trail. Would you vote for him or Harris? Regardless if you thought she was perfect or not.

        If you voted for Trump, you obviously didnt care about policy when every indication points to his being objectively worse. And I’m ready to argue that all day.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No. You’re showing the same fundamental misunderstanding the Democrats do.

          If people are hurting, and one candidate says “I see you’re hurting, and I will do XYZ to help you” while another says “We’re all doing fine, nothing will change with me” - it’s no wonder people go with the former! Even if they are lying.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well they don’t even have to decide they wanna eat a shit sandwich- they just have to not be motivated enough to go to the polls and say “I’d like the snot sandwich instead of the shit sandwich, please”. Which is what seems to have happened this election as best I’m aware

      A lot of democratic voters weren’t motivated, and didn’t show up. And I agree with the statement made by the person quoted in the post, a huge part of that feels like it’s the democratic party’s complete unwillingness to criticize moneyed interests and figure out how to actually appeal to their constituency, and so they’re loosing people. And now we’re all stuck with that shit sandwich.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      the voters aren’t wrong

      CITATION NEEDED

      Don’t worry though, we won’t have to worry about voters soon, right?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        CITATION NEEDED

        America is a democracy, is it not? In a democracy the voters decide who leads them. There’s nobody to “overrule” them. If you want to lead them you have to convince them to vote for you, you can’t declare them “wrong” and take power anyway.

        Don’t worry though, we won’t have to worry about voters soon, right?

        Are you saying that’d be a good thing? That seems to be what you’re suggesting, but this also seems to be sarcasm.

        Do you think the voters should be overruled when they vote Republican but not when they vote Democrat?

        • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Direct quote from the orange man: vote for me this one time, and you won’t have to vote any more. But I’m sure you conveniently missed that part of the rage cycle last year and definitely aren’t being obtuse in bad faith.

          The voters can make an objectively incorrect decision, that is their prerogative. Doesn’t exonerate them for being mocked, where else would leopards eating faces get its content from?

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Direct quote from the orange man: vote for me this one time, and you won’t have to vote any more. But I’m sure you conveniently missed that part of the rage cycle last year and definitely aren’t being obtuse in bad faith.

            I honestly have no idea what you’re saying here. I think democracy is good, overall. You’re apparently agreeing with me, but in a way that makes it sound like you’re accusing me of opposing democracy somehow?

            The voters can make an objectively incorrect decision, that is their prerogative.

            The decision being made is “who do we want to have as president?” It’s an opinion.

            • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I think democracy is the best option. very different from good.

              Opinions can be wrong. The fact that that needs to be stated is laughable.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      My concern with statements like this is that I don’t think your considering the impact that misinformation had on this election.

      There were massive disinformation campaigns that had sizable effects on the dialogue that people had with their friends and neighbors. I’m worried that we could have actually put someone like Bernie as our nominee and that we still would have lost because of exactly this misinformation.

      The Democrat message wasn’t making it to people and I think that it really shows…

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Democrats message was literally “The Cheney’s like us!” and “ithe economy is fine, the GDP has never been higher!” while everyone’s lives are objectivly worse than they were 2 years ago. What messge do you think people wanted to here?

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          23 hours ago

          If you want to be completely reductionist, then sure. They were trying to show that Trump was so upsetting that people were crossing party lines to vote Democrat…not that Democrats have becomes so centrist that they attracted right-wingers. And the economy has been great, they’re not wrong. The Democrat platform was also fantastic: $6k child tax credit, $25k first time home buyer assistance, tax reforms replacing the corporate tax rate to 28%< and taxing the rich, capping medication costs, union support, pushing reproductive rights, climate action, immigration reform. They had a STRONG platform.

          …but that wasn’t good enough. So they elected the billionaire conman that is putting up his billionaire cronies. That’s going to help the economy. Like…could the Democrat message have been better? Sure, but it wasn’t bad by any means.

          But how are you supposed to argue with someone who doesn’t operate on facts?

          • noscere@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Jesus H. Christ…you wrote that paragraph and meant it, without any reflection.

            To start I voted for Harris, and every Dem down ballot.

            But I see your list of a few boring economic things which would never have touched my life, a tax rate so low that it is disgusting, and a bunch of nebulous promises with no real policy.

            Capping medication cost…how exactly? Biden capped the medicare cost of like 12 medications…So just keep going like that. Is THAT the reform policy? Because fuck that. That isn’t change, that is tinkering.

            Union support…What exactly does this mean. Does this mean the Dems wont break strikes? Because the Dems kept breaking strikes under Biden.

            Pushing reproductive rights…ummm, but what does this mean? Does this include fixing the Supreme Court and the Filibuster so that actual legislation can happen…because we both know it does not.

            Climate action? More drilling happened under Biden than Trump.

            Immigration Reform? Dude, Biden was horrible on immigration, he just continued the Trump policy, then after being beaten over the head with immigration for 3 years pushed a right wing immigration reform to call the Republicans bluff. And Harris did nothing to differentiate herself from Biden.

            And of course…then there is the weapon sales and genocide denial-ism. That too was a policy.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Trump didn’t have many more voters this time around than 4 years ago. Democrats didn’t go out to vote because they don’t believe the in the message the DNC has been putting out for the last 8 years. I don’t know what it will take to get you to understand that. All those policies are shit the Republicans would have pushed for 20 years ago. People don’t want tax credits dor their children, they want access to healthcare and and affordable child care. They don’t want tax credits for first time home buyers, they want landlords tarred and feathered on the courthouse steps. People can’t afford their rent and food anymore but the DNC are so far up their own ass they can’t see that.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Disagreeing with something doesnt make it disinformation. What were the big lies being spread about Kamala that affected the voter base? I’m not on social media, the only thing I watched was the live interview she did on fox, and she was rude and deceptive. Is an uncut interview disinformation?

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a bad take that I keep seeing.

      Yes, the DNC fucked up massively. They should definitely have done more to convince voters.

      But the voters who voted Trump/3rd party/abstained because of that are also morons who fucked up massively.

      Both things are true. The DNC’s glaring mistakes do not absolve the voters of their agency. The lesson isn’t that the dog-turd sandwich eaters are rational actors, it’s that the DNC needs to take into consideration people being irrational morons if they want to win. But at the end of the day, they’re not the ones eating the sandwich. Voters have their own lesson to learn.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Both things are true.

        That’s fine, I wasn’t saying the second thing was false. I wasn’t saying anything about the second thing at all.

        The Democrats don’t get to choose what electorate they’re trying to convince. They must convince the American electorate. You can say whatever you want about the electorate but that doesn’t change the Democrats’ one job.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The voters aren’t wrong

          That’s certainly something.

          I’m perfectly fine criticizing the DNC for screwing up their one job, but that doesn’t erase my disdain for the views screwing up their’s.

          And in fact, I think all this focus on criticizing the DNC over the voters, here on lemmy, is counterproductive. It isn’t incorrect, but look around you. Do you think DNC leadership is hanging out here reading these comments? I doubt it. I know for a fact that there are voters here who thought boycotting Harris would accomplish something.

          If you’re going to write DNC leadership to lay bare their inadequacies, have at it. But doing that here just reinforces the idea that the voters don’t have their share of the blame. It’s just circle jerking about how everything is the Dem’s fault. The only ones who benefit from that are the Republicans, salivating over the infighting.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            but that doesn’t erase my disdain

            Sorry buddy, literally no one cares about your disdain.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I criticize both the DNC and the American voters.

            However, one of those things is much more capable of short-term change than the other. So criticism of that thing is much more valuable in the short term than criticism of the other.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Again, one of those things is in the audience right now, the other is not. Criticizing people who aren’t around to hear you has no value. You might as well whisper your complaints into a shoebox to tuck under your bed.

              I encourage everyone to join me in writing their representatives detailed messages about their shortcomings, and proposed remedies. I encourage everyone to convince others to do the same. I encourage everyone to be politically active between elections.

              I also encourage everyone to use their vote strategically on election day to slow the rise of fascism. Calling out ineffective strategy is part of that.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t deny voters their agency by saying they can’t make wrong choices. They can and did. They made a stupid choice for idiotic reasons, and will get nothing but suffering for it. There are situations in life where feeling deeply and unconditionally ashamed of your own idiocy is the correct course of action, and this is one of them.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Don’t deny voters their agency by saying they can’t make wrong choices. They can and did.

        Don’t deny Dem leaders their agency by saying they can’t make wrong choices. They can and did.

        • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Only the mind of a child could think of the idea that the two are mutually exclusive.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Voters have agency. Let’s tell them how they will be voting and do nothing to appeal to them.

        If they were too insignificant to listen to, they are too insignificant to blame. Your party lost because your party is shit on purpose.

        I voted for Harris and of course Trump is worse, so spare me the only talking point any of you have.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Votes can’t be wrong by definition, they are opinions. But if you accepted that you would have to get off your pedestal wouldnt you, and thats no fun. Go ahead and puff up your chest and brag about how obviously stupid so many people are.