• PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Or buy a replica, for a very small fraction of the price and see if anyone ever knows the difference.

      I have a $350 Japanese made replica of a Patek Philippe Grand Complication, everything works on it. To me it is indistinguishable from the real thing and didn’t cost me $300,000

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Always buy fakes, if you find a good quality fake. No one will know. Unless you absolutely don’t care about the money.

  • el_bhm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Every watch guy will tell you otherwise. And present a spectrum of choices across multiple price bands.

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Bought a Casio Data Bank DBC-32B-1ADF “calculator watch” about three years ago for like $30 USD. I get more compliments on that watch than any other piece of clothing/accessory that I own. Started using it as my daily driver watch and it’s genuinely great, a real conversation starter. If anybody wants one, they’re still in production and can be easily bought new on the big retailers’ sites.

    • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Jealous! I’ve wanted a Casio calculator watch since I was a child. Technically my off brand smart watch has a calculator, but it’s not the same.

  • Dicska@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I absolutely love the design but I’m surprised nobody has pointed out that this goes against the very purpose of wrist watches: you can’t just turn your wrist and look at the time.

    I know it’s just a press of a button, but if only one of your hands is full (depending whether you’re right or left handed) then it gets annoying rather quickly.

    As for the Rolex obsession: I’ve lost several watches, but every single time I just re-bought my cheap Casio. I love it and it does the job quite reliably. Also, I personally dislike analog watches.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That was the purpose before the invention of pocket computers pretending to be phones. Now they’re just jewelry. They don’t even need to function anymore.

      • Dicska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        TBF I still have both. Nothing beats quickly glancing at your wrist (until they develop built in HUD brain chips, so another 2 years). Especially when you’re doing hand stuff anyway.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Me, with my watchy, not givenafuuuuuck bout Rolex.

    But yeah that’s some rad nerd chic there.

    • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most well-known “luxury” brands are. Real rich person’s brands won’t even bother selling to the poor. There’s currently a meltdown among the middle class because Hermes is laughing them out of the store. It’s quite funny.

      • Odelay42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Just to be clear - Hermes is also a fucking waste of money that serves no purpose other than to signal your membership in a club that has no value to society.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Seriously. Past a certain level of wealth, you don’t even need to buy brand-named items for most everyday things. You don’t buy a suit from an expensive brand. You hire a world-class master tailor to custom make you a suit from scratch. It’s fit exactly to your body, made to your exact tastes and specifications. The same thing should be possible with watches. You don’t buy an expensive brand, you hire a watch maker to make you an entirely custom piece.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Have you never been to a high-end store where the retail workers just act sorta superior to you because they sell expensive things you can’t afford (but at the same time make multiple times less than you because they’re retail workers and you’re not)? It’s that kinda thing. It’s weird af.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They’re paid to act that way. In case a rich is in the store… Can’t have a rich person seeing a poor treated with respect.

            It’s all about reinforcing class norms

            • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I don’t know about the luxury brands but I’ve seen people act that way at fucking Zara so I’m sure they’re just deluded assholes because there’s no way Zara pays above minimum wage.

  • Redkey@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Almost everyone in this thread is talking about wannabe tryhards, investment, and reliable watches, but for people who are interested in the pictured watch, they’re real, but pretty cheap and flimsy; I have a couple.

    They came out in gashapon machines a couple of years ago, although I got mine just last year for (IIRC) ¥500 a pop. It’s a series by Takara-Tomy with two models of Saturn (black and white), and two models of PS1 (PSX and PSOne).

    https://dlmag.com/playstation-1-and-sega-saturn-themed-watches-for-classic-game-fans/

    https://www.piggygaga.com/shop/gashapon-sega-saturn-playstation-vs-watch-collection/

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Just adding to your post, Japanese yen dont factor in decimals. So if you were to right out 500 yen like we do dollars itd be 5.00 yen, so five bucks.

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just FYI for whoever needs to read this: If you go into debt for a single investment, it’s a mistake. You are supposed to invest your excess, into as many isolated pools as reasonable. If you’re part of the majority of the population, which doesn’t have an excess, you are not investing - you are gambling.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just FYI for anyone who needs to read this: it doesn’t matter how fucking wealthy you are, ranking yourself with a watch is cringe and idiotic. Don’t be a fucking sheep if you are poor. Don’t be a fucking sheep if you are rich.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is not really applicable and only works if you look at investments pretty naively.

      The most obvious rebuttal to this is home ownership a mortgage is debt and is also a ‘single purchase’ however for most people, a mortgage is their first step towards financial independence. The next concept of course is TVM (time value of money), having cash available now to invest in worth more than later, and so utilizing leverage to invest money is important.

      Generally, investments that beat interest make it worth it to utilize debt to make them, this is the premise behind investing using margin, utilizing heloc loans, or taking out a loan for a business, education, or tooling that will allow you to earn more.

      Debt isn’t inherently bad and there are many ways to use debt to your advantage.

      A good way to look at it is like this, if you have a line of credit available to you that satisfies your emergency fund, let’s say a few thousand dollars, instead of sitting on the fund in a low interest savings account, you can move that to something marginally less liquid, like an REIT or an index fund, and use the line of credit to float cash until you can withdraw. Use the credit for the 4-6 days it takes to clear the transaction. You may pay some interest, but the emergency fund will have actually gained significantly more than any interest you would pay.

      Not all investment is the same, buying out of the money long calls on mene stocks is not the same as moving medium or long term savings to high dividend managed funds.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d say the mortgage example is special, as it’s not just an investment for investment’s sake, it’s a house you are actually going to use, and your realistic alternative is to rent a place on indefinite terms.

        For most folks, investments that beat the loan interest is a tricky and often outright risky proposition. If you are leveraging yourself too far then you are almost certainly not getting a good rate, and the investment may be assumed to do better, but could go significantly worse.

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yea I agree, and things like trading on high margin or using standard lines of credit to invest are generally bad unless you really know what you are getting into.

          But it isn’t always hard to beat interest, it just depends. HELOCS are a great tool for people and depending on your situation, you can get them significantly lower than typical returns. Yea it’s a risk, but so is getting in your car and driving to work everyday. There is no income without some type of risk, opportunity cost, physical/mental health, etc. I think just like most things, there is balance. A student loan for a college degree is not much different than a traditional investment, neither is a note on a truck + lawn care equipment for a fledgling business. They all have risk, but they (along with mortgages) are more tangible for a lot of people.

          My point is mainly that, sometimes it is ok to go into debt for a single purchase. I don’t think it’s smart to just open a bunch of credit cards and yolo your life savings into long calls, but I also don’t think it’s smart to squirrel money away in your mattress because all debt is evil.

      • gencha@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thanks for providing the additional clarifications, I think pretty much all of it is valid, I just have a slightly different perspective.

        Most people would likely agree with you that investing into a home through dept is reasonable. I don’t disagree.

        I also agree that you can utilize loaned capital in a way that your earnings outperform the debt incurred.

        You’re still gambling though. You can not afford to lose your home, or that loaned capital. Maybe you feel like your chances are good, and maybe they really are, but you’re relying on your personal prediction of the future to ultimately resolve that debt.

        A “real” investment is just as much gambling, but the fallout from failure is entirely different.

    • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      A watch is never a good “investment” anyway. Re-sale value is a nice to have but it’s not a buy and hold.

      Anyone telling people to go into debt to buy a watch is at best a fucking moron and potentially actively malicious.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      There are two exceptions: education and real estate. Treat education as an investment (and research it as such). And real estate probably isn’t worth going into debt to buy unless it’s your primary residence.

  • Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What an idiotic OP (in the picture not you). Go into debt over a status symbol with as much utility as a $10 substitute. Yes, brilliant advice.

    • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same as all the muppets in the city dressed up to the nines in their new beemer than you know is on monthly payments.

      On the other hand; being debt free, now there’s a status symbol…

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Being debt free one of the few status symbols you cannot see. At that point, is it a status symbol if other people cannot see it?

        I mean, I still agree though. Be debt free, seriously.

          • porl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            As someone starting up a custom t-shirt printing business desperately in need of building a customer base, I condone this message.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          A healthy financial life contributed to getting me a wife. It also would’ve gotten me laid if life hadn’t gotten in the way. A hot lady really liked my fiscal responsibility (her marriage was collapsing because her husband lacked that trait)

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        being debt free

        I know a few people who are definitely not in a hurry to pay off low-interest mortgages from 2020 and 2021, but I suppose that they’re already in a very different financial position from the people who might consider going into debt for a watch.

        • NeatoBuilds@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Can’t take the house with you when you die so the less you end up paying the better in a way, unless you have someone to pass it on to like kids

          • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Those mortgages have an interest rate of less than 3%, but now the returns on even low-risk investments are higher than that, so the borrower is better off investing the money, using some of the profit from that to pay mortgage interest, and keeping the rest.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Even more: an interest rate of <3% is basically blown away by annual inflation.

              That assumes your salary goes up with inflation, though.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Had a friend who graduated from Georgetown with a law degree and went to work at a NYC white shoe law firm. Shortly before his first meeting with a client, his boss dragged him into the office and opened a drawer in his desk. The man had half a dozen different watches, none of which were less than $10k/ea. He matched one with my friend’s suit and sent him back out. Apparently, clients at that level simply won’t take you seriously unless you’ve got that much on your wrist.

      That said, this was at an office on the penthouse floor of a lower Manhattan sky-rise. Nobody making cold calls out of a boiler room in Cincinnati cares that you overpaid for a watch.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yeah, Cincinnati lawyers don’t know what time it is as a point of pride. They woo their clients by springing for a full 5 way.

      • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Read an anecdote of someone in a similar station who had a client file a complaint against them because their watch was too nice. See, he’s the employee who is servicing the client. He’s beneath the client. He can’t be wearing nicer stuff than the client.

        I don’t know how these people look at themselves in the mirror every morning.

      • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fuck Big Law.

        The whole thing is a ponzi scheme built on the backs of overworked associates.

        Sure, you can make money… But you’re gambling on becoming a partner while wasting your best years.

        Work-life balance >> “But I’ve got a roley and no family!”

    • directive0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean when viewed from the perspective of his world it makes sense.

      He lives in a world where substance is meaningless and all that matters is appearance and bravado. I can appreciate why to him that seems like good advice. Just kinda bums me out people live like that, but I bet he’s happy having power and influence and money. Good for him.

      I couldn’t and wouldn’t fuckin live that way and I will stick with my Casio a158, thanks.

    • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously, FUCK YOU if you peddle this hussle culture grindset bullshit. I feel so sorry for the poor souls that fall for this shit because no one ever taught them any better.

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Blue Check Twitter Logic. Never has there been more superficial moronic fraudsters in one place.

  • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let me give you some real advice, buy a Casio G-SHOCK, pick a version with tiny solar panels. Seriously, they will last a very long time, no need to change a battery or synch it. Strapped my watch on like a decade ago, still works without any maintenance or anything.

    • kina@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Same. Got my G-SHOCK GW-M5610. Basically the ThinkPad of watches. Will never break, throw it in the ocean, smash with a hammer. Still trucks on. Was like $60 when I bought it. Most comfortable watch for travelling and every day use.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yes! I bought one 15 years ago and it’s still trucking. Solar powered and syncs with an atomic clock so no maintenance. Also while cleaning I found a cheapo battery powered gshock that’s probably just as old if not older, and it was still going and only 8 minutes off. Seriously amazing watches. If I didn’t rely on my smartwatch for sleep tracking and notifications, I wouldn’t wear anything else

      • lesnout27@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        That or the Casio A168WE if you want something that’s not the G-Shock or the Pro-Trek.

        • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Definitely in the category of “ol’ reliable” in terms of watches but I like the Pro-Trek because of some of the added features like the compass, barometer and altimeter.

        • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’ve had mine for a good while now and it’s out up with all maner of abuse. Plus mine has a canvas strap that I prefer over metal or silicone.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If you are a first time Rolex buyer you for sure aren’t getting the watches that will appreciate in value. Rolex purposely creates a scarcity and will only sell limited watches to long time customers who have bought many less valuable watches before. It’s also so chuds that believe this guy don’t devalue the brand.

    • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, for people who aren’t aware…Rolex reps only make certain high demand models available to preferred customers, i.e. people who have a track record of purchases with them. That’s why these models are so “exclusive”. It’s a long con.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Had a friend buy his second or third Rolex and we were all new grads. I was broke as hell at the time so it surprised me he was buying watches the price of a car right out of uni (and his parents just bought him an apartment so he lived in a different world).

      He was telling me how this watch is gonna increase in value so it’d be stupid not to get it.

      I never said it and only thought about it, but I was thinking that if you were buying it as an investment, why are you wearing it? Why not keep it at home? It could get stolen or lost or broken. But I guess I have brokey mentality.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Past a certain level of wealth, it might make sense to invest in some really expensive jewelry just as an emergency and liquid wealth store.

        Consider the US right now with its volatile political situation. Or any other country with volatile and uncertain politics. Or just uncertainty from major national disasters. People sometimes need to flee from disasters on short notice.

        For a normal person, carrying around $100k worth of jewelry on your person would be foolish. For most middle class people, that would a substantial portion of your wealth that they’re walking around risking. But imagine your net worth is $50 million. Now that $100k worth of jewelry you wear every day is only 0.5% of your net worth. But if you need to bug out of your city or flee the country for some reason, you now carry around with you the means to do so. International money transfers can take time, and bank accounts can be frozen. But if you have $100k in jewelry just on your person, you have a liquid form of emergency bugout money. You can get on a plane with nothing but the clothes on your back, fly to a far off country, and immediately have access to enough resources to get yourself set up. Even if your accounts or frozen or your nation’s banking system has collapsed, you can pawn some of that jewelry off to obtain essentials like food, shelter, etc.

        I think a fair number of rich people like having this amount of jewelry for the same reason that they often like having multiple passports. The odds of having to ever flee the country are low. And for most people, maintaining the means to flee the country at a moment’s notice is simply too much. But when the cost is a tiny portion of your net worth, putting what is the equivalent of pocket change into the ability to quickly flee a country isn’t so unreasonable anymore.