• Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    She’s one of only half a handful of Dems that sound ready to lead people into battle. The difference between how she uses knowledge and intelligence to speak to people is in stark comparison to Trump sounding exactly like he has dementia. She listens and responds. Trump just keeps interrupting any question he doesn’t like. Fuck you Maga. Fuck you entirely. You god damn idiots.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Disagree. The Democrats dont know who they are anymore. Pelosi and the old Democrats have got to go.

    AOC should just make a new party.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        “It’s my turn.” was everything wrong with Hillary’s campaign in a nut shell.

        How the fuck are you able to make yourself look like an unhinged ego-maniac who just wants to be President for the sake of being President, when you’re running against Trump? That shouldn’t be possible.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          How the fuck are you able to make yourself look like an unhinged ego-maniac who just wants to be President for the sake of being President, when you’re running against Trump?

          This isn’t a problem of Trumpism, it’s a naturally occurring brainworm in Americans broadly speaking. Trump’s a nasty dim-witted freak, so watching him climb to the top of the pile we’ve been raised to believe was a meritocracy causes all sorts of cognitive dissonance. But everyone running for President (except maybe Mike Gravel) ends up looking like this. The thing that separates the Obamas and Trumps from the Hillarys and McCains is whether cheering for the unhinged ego-maniac feels fun or not.

    • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      She’s just the most recent candidate. The most recent candidates, and most recent Presidents and Vice Presidents are almost always in these sorts of lists, especially in the weeks and months following an election, before the next campaign starts.

      Joe Biden was a favorite in these sorts of polls in 2015/16, despite saying he wouldn’t run, because he was just VP.

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    She’s one of like 3 US politicians that I don’t just kind of low-key actively hate.

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    I hope she will be successful in actually overtaking the party to some degree, as most high-ranking party members would certainly see that differently

  • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    So “AOC not even close” with 26% but Kamala Harris + Pete Buttigieg + Hakeem Jeffries + Cory Booker + Gavin Newsom = 22%. And that 26% has almost guaranteed the 8% of Crockett and the 12% of Sanders. So 26 + 12 + 8 = 46% but “not even close”.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      The headline means “AOC is seen as the leader of the Dems and nobody is even close to her”.

      The DNC chair is not usually an elected congressperson, and AOC is absolutely not looking for that job. They’re just talking about the person people think about as the leader.

        • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh, the qurstion was rhetorical – the function was a relevancy check. The Hill may think all of those names are important but only half are making it out of the political wonkosphere.

          (wonk is an mid 20th century word for nerd)

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I have said this elsewhere, but i will not again vote for the Democratic Party until they actually put up progressive candidates. Not pinky swear to pass progressive policy. That means the candidates has to have a provable history of struggling against the Democratic Party to pass progressive policy. There are only two i know of and that’s Bernie Sanders (who is too old for the presidency), and AOC. Else it’s third party until the democrats learn better.

  • chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    If she jettisons neoliberalism and takes a stand against genocide and imperialism she could begin to make a difference.